Planning Review Committee

We met today to discuss two planning applications.  There were seven councillors present at the meeting.

The first application was for a development at Cantay House off Park End Street.   The application was actually deferred after a discussion about contributions to social housing in developments of 4-9 units that has just been agreed at full council on 19th December.  You can see the Development Plan Document (DPD).  The whole question really is about how much weight can be given to a policy that was not in place when the application was made, was not in place when it was first determined by the West Area planning committee and is yet to be approved by a planning inspector.   If there is an appeal (on grounds of non-determination) then I imagine we'll see!

The second application was for a change to what many know as the John Allen Centre, whereby B&Q's building will be subdivided at the end of the B&Q lease providing another Sainsbury's supermarket as well as some café/restaurant units and four houses fronting onto Rymers Lane.  The bulk of the discussion was about a developer contribution to improve the lighting of the area on the other side of the retail park to make things safer for people accessing the site from roads such as Maidcroft Road, Cleveland Drive and Havelock Road.  There was also concern about the hours during which the service yard can be used and I hope that proper enforcement of allowed hours will improve matters for some local residents who are being sleep-deprived by some extremely antisocial behaviour by delivery companies.  The application was approved.

Full Council

The last full council of 2011 and a ridiculously full agenda! We met at 5pm and I didn't stop until 10.37pm and even then, had not dealt with the motions on notices, statements and questions.

There were some very important items at this meeting.

The council also considered plans for Barton West and also the latest round of attacks on HMO tenants and landlords.  The use of a house as an HMO (that means 3 or more unrelated people living there) is a different planning use class and Labour has made it a requirement that all changes to use class C4 will require planning permission and that change of use from C3 (family home) to C4 will require planning permission.  Even more worrying is that planning permission will be refused if there are more than 20% of properties in that street already in use as HMOs.  I think that will be catastrophically disastrous for Oxford's housing situation.  We'll see.

I am utterly appalled at some of the judgemental and social-sorting based on tenure language that is being used by this Labour Council.  Try "However, in some areas of the city, high concentrations of HMOs are resulting in changes to the character of the local area, and may also contribute to local parking problems, large numbers of transient households, and the affordability of renting or buying homes in Oxford. This has led some people to believe that their communities are becoming unbalanced, because the number of short‐term tenants with less established community ties has grown too large."

I think that's outrageous and hope that lots of Oxford-dwellers will agree. I see it as nothing more than a direct attack on students, honest landlords and anyone elsewho can't afford to live in Oxford in any other way than in an HMO.

Another thing discussed was the issue of adopting some legislation to allow the licensing of horse-drawn carriages in the City Centre. This was being recommended by the General Purposes Licensing Committee but I am pleased that the Full Council saw that any horse drawn carriages would be inappropriate in such a constrained City as Oxford for reasons both of horse welfare and pedestrian, cyclist safety. I was glad to be one of the 27 that voted against the Licensing Committee's recommendation.  This shocking video from New York is one of the things that convinced me to vote against.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWhmuUUeZKU&feature=player_embedded

A long and tiring meeting and some really stupid planning decisions rushed through by our current megalomaniac Labour Administration if you ask me!

City Centre Neighbourhood Action Group

These meetings are always useful and I was impressed at the chairing skills of Matt Sulley, the Police Officer who has taken over the running of the group.  We had some useful discussion about what to do about speeding on St. Giles and also about some antisocial behaviour issues in the City Centre.  I commented about how many obscenely drunk people there are in the City Centre in the small hours, particularly at the weekends, and suggested that some venues must be serving people who are too drunk.  I do hope Oxford can try to lead the way on doing something about this as getting that drunk is really not good for the health of anyone involved and I can't really believe it's a good night out either to have to be picked up by by a parent and drive home with your head in a washing up bowl!

The meeting was rather short as we had full council at 5pm.

Union Street Student Accommodation permission granted and subsequent councillor abuse

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Using far too much paper and resources?

Last Friday I received the agenda for City Executive Board (CEB). It was three volumes totalling 944 pages, double-sided so only 472 pieces of paper. As normal this was delivered to my home by the council courier van (while I was probably at work).   This would be the same for all 48 members of council (some may have elected to have papers delivered elsewhere but all are entitled to a delivery).  That's a staggering 22,656 pieces of paper for one meeting - and that's without the officer copies and the spare ones for the members of the public at the meeting!  At a conservative £5/500 sheets that's approaching £300 just on the paper, without considering the staff time to prepare, print, collate and bind the material as well as the staff time to deliver it to houses and the costs of running the courier's van.

CEB is an important meeting as it has all the executive power of the council so all members of council do need to see the papers but I really don't believe many actually have time to read every sheet of paper in such a huge agenda.  This is 944 pages to read between when I got home on Friday and the CEB meeting the next Wednesday.  That's about 5 full days that already have lots of time committed, not least to my day job!

Yesterday, given that the CEB  meeting is in the past I put my papers in the recycling, as there was nothing confidential, for it to be collected by another part of the council.

Today I received the agenda for full council on 19th December.  It's another 350 or so pages!  I'm seriously considering asking the courier to deliver straight to the recycling centre to cut out the middle man (me!)

Now it's not that I don't want to read these reports but as you can see from the links in this item, they are all available on the City Council's web site. Why not just send councillors the contents pages so we can browse on the web for any reports that we actually need to read thoroughly?

I am pleased that City Council IT is looking into getting councillors to use tablet devices to read papers and it really can't come too quickly as far as I am concerned.  I read almost everything online these days and the council really does make it pretty easy to find stuff:  There is a full public page on Council meetings and there is even an RSS feed for those that prefer to use things like Google Reader.  That feed is also on this blog page.

Nice comments from Oxford University Student Union

Working with and engaging with our Universities, particularly the student body, is always a challenge.  Not because anyone makes it difficult but I think because students come and go so quickly and because the senior people in the Students' unions change every year.  This academic year, Oxford University Student Union (OUSU) is lucky to have Daniel Stone (Dan) as its Vice President (Charities and Community).  He works tirelessly to try to bring Students and City together and it's great as a City Councillor to have a meaningful way to interface with the many students who live in Carfax Ward, the residents of which I represent!

Dan recently published a nice column in the Oxford Student, the official newspaper of OUSU, that couldn't really have been nicer.  You should be able to read it if you click on it here but if not, here's the middle paragraph:

"City Councillors are here to represent students too!  There are City Council wards running through the centre of Oxford and extending out through Jericho, Summertown and over the Magdalen Bridge.  We're lucky to have a fantastic group of Councillors, many of whom were former students and consequently want to engage with the student population as much as possible.  But it's up to us to speak and make our voices heard"

Thanks Dan - it's a pleasure to be able to serve you and the students of Oxford!

Do read the whole article if you can. Click it to enlarge it.

Site Visit for Union Street Planning Application

We visited the site of planning application for some student accommodation in a constrained little site off Union Street in East Oxford, near to East Oxford Primary School and one of its external sports areas.  This application was approved by West Area Planning Committee last month and was call-in to Planning Review Committee.  We should have heard it on 30th November but as that was the day of strikes, I and many other committee members agreed not to cross the picket line and to defer the meeting.  We now re-determine the application on 15th December.

This application is the one that was the subject of the nasty anti-student comments I posted about last month so I thought we ought to have a site visit to try to get a feel for the site and try to understand the position of all people and groups concerned.

I was grateful that two planning officers were able to attend and explain the site to us, with the proper plans.  I attended along with Nuala Young and Mike Rowley so that means at least some of the committee will have first-hand experience of the site.  I'm sure others will know it too as it is currently the site of the "Plebs College" squat so it's been in the news a lot lately.

I shan't comment here on my views on the merits or otherwise of the application as I want to be able to listen carefully to what people say and make an unbiased decision at the meeting on Thursday 15th December.  Click the picture to see a larger version of it.

Lord Mayor's Christmas Reception

This is the annual event held at the Town Hall where councillors all get to bring two guests from local charities doing good in the area and one personal guest.

This year I invited Wendy Woodcock, from the CfBT Education Trust, as she is Chair of Governors at Oxford Spires Academy where I am also a governor. CfBT is also the principal sponsor of Oxford Spires Academy.  I also invited Sue Croft, the Principal of Oxford Spires Academy. My personal guest was my sister, Emma, as she's been living in Oxford for a couple of years now and it seemed appropriate to introduce her to council colleagues.

The event is always a good opportunity to say thank you to those who work so hard for our City in various ways.  Wendy has done a sterling job helping a fledgling academy and its fledgling Governing Body to become effective very quickly and Sue really is an inspirational leader of Oxford Spires Academy.  The difference they will both make to education and educational attainment of Children in our City is, I think, extremely important.  I was delighted to be able to invite them both to the reception.  Some excellent links were made and it was good to raise the profile of Oxford Spires Academy among other councillors and their guests, as well as the City Council's Chief executive.

My sister is an independent speech and language therapist and had some useful conversations about her work with some of those present too.

Why I am on strike today

I work for the University of Oxford and am a paid-up member of the Universities and Colleges Union.  I've just set my work out of office message to read:

"Thank you for your email.  In line with the ballot of the University and Colleges Union I am taking part in industrial action in the form of a strike today to send a message to our government that I will not accept their erosion of and withdrawal of support to UK Higher Education.  This means I will not be dealing with any email sent to me today.  If you still wish to contact me please re-send your email another day."

I will not be crossing any picket lines in to the town hall today and fully support the action by all the hard working council staff that provide you and me with so many services we depend on right across the City.

It was bad enough that Clegg and co carped on about what a good thing tuition fees of £9k were and now the Tory-led coalition is attempting to slash remuneration for academic and academic-related (that's me) staff in Universities in the form of a big reduction in pension benefits and an increase in contributions from employees.  Now let me be clear, these changes don't affect me YET but I see them as part of a slippery slope so I am willing to join the legally-called strike action to support the work of the Universities and Colleges Union to protect the rights of my current and future colleagues and to join the collective effort in sending as strong a message as possible to the coalition that Higher Education (along with many other public services) is much more valuable than this and that the cuts are going too far.  If we screw higher education now then in 20 or so years time we'll be in a much greater mess than we are now!

I should also say that I don't think Labour did any better when in power and it's shocking how they don't really have a plan to get the UK out the financial mess THAT THEY LET US GET INTO when they were last in power.  We do have to sort out the economy and reverse the dangerous slip back to recession that we're currently seeing. The Leader of the Labour Party isn't even supporting this strike (See http://labourlist.org/2011/11/ed-miliband-wont-back-strikes/) which I think is frankly outrageous given how it was the Unions that got him elected to be leader of the party in the first place!

It's good to see that the coalition is taking its responsibilities on benefits seriously and has protected the most vulnerable in society from real-terms cuts in income. I'm also pleased to see that the chancellor has put the January rise in fuel taxes (struggling families really can't afford it any more than the many business that are now spending so much on fuel) on hold but there is still so much more that could be done.

I know it's fashionable to bash bankers and so on but really - do these people actually NEED to be so wealthy?  Remember - it wasn't the public sector workers (from nurses to civil servants to academics to border control staff) who caused this recession.  You didn't see them engaging in all sort of greed-fuelled high-risk, low-sense banking activity that simply made them richer and left the UK (and much of the rest of the world) in the mess it is now in.  And are they paying the penalty for any of this? Not a chance!  The coalition is trying to dump it all on the hard-working, lower-paid public sector and almost universally public spirited workers of our country.  If Labour had regulated the banks properly about 10 years ago then I believe we wouldn't be in the mess we are now in.  But I'm not an economist so don't pretend to have all the answers here.  [following comments, I should add that it's investment bankers I have the real problem with, not so much the retail bankers although they should not have been allowed to let individuals get into so much personal debt either]

Remember - nobody chooses a public sector job for the money - so for the coalition to hit us rather than hitting those who are making a fortune out of everyone else's suffering is, I think, utterly outrageous.

National Landlords Association Oxford Branch Meeting

This was an interesting meeting, attended by about 20 of Oxford's decent and honest landlords as well as Ian Wright, the City Council Service Manager that covers HMOs and Ken Staunton, the NLA Head of Regions.

Ken first spoke about the NLA Landlord accreditation scheme which looks like is a really useful thing.  I am impressed at how much information it provides and how it has a requirement for Continual Professional Development for Landlords.  That's very important in the continual changing regulatory landscape in which the business has to operate these days.

There was then a talk by Ian Wright from the City Council about the additional HMO registration scheme.  Ian did a good job of explaining what I think is a completely over-the top scheme that is crippling the HMO market.  It's not Ian's fault - he's just doing what the Labour Administration of Oxford City Council tell him but there really are a lot of charges and I was appalled to hear that the council is demanding extra works on 97% of properties where licenses are being applied for.  In most cases tenants and landlords were entirely happy before the council interfered.  Ian did show some slides of some awful cases where council intervention is clearly needed and welcome but I suspect none of those applied to to the good and honest landlords present last night.  There was also a list given of successful prosecutions.  I was a bit surprised that the names of all those convicted were included and didn't really understand why Ian included a case where someone had been imprisoned after performing an illegal eviction.  That case was nothing to do with HMO licensing even though that was the subject of Ian's talk.

There was a lot of dicussion and confusion about the change to HMO registration requirements coming in January 2012 and the Article 4 direction on planning which removes the permitted development right to change a property from C3 (domestic household) to C4 (HMO with 3-6 unrelated sharers) coming in February 2012.  It's fascinating to me that the council seems to act as if Landlords are nasty evildoers trying to extort money out of tenants while spending as little as possible whereas what I saw was a bunch of honest professionals trying to run their business in an honest a way as possible.  There is clearly a lot of confusion about the ridiculous amount over over-regulation the Labour council is trying to pile onto the HMO market in Oxford.  I find it really hard to understand as Oxford is depsperately short of housing and HMOs provide a vital part of the housing mix.  If Landlords are persecuted and saddled with ridiculous amounts of expense for work that nobody wants then that will just get passed on in increased rents and Oxford's housing (and homelessness) problems will jut get worse.  I wish Labour would just accept that being a landlord is just an honest business in the same that running a taxi, a shop, or a bar is.

The meeting took about 2 hours and was extremely interesting.

Back from Holiday to a tirade of anti-student vitriol

I'm just back from a week away and disgusted by some of the emails I have received about a planning application in East Oxford. Clearly there is a campaign going on and a standard email has been circulated. I quote some phrases repeated in many of them:

"from my many years of experience of the growing numbers of students in the East Oxford area they are incapable of talking quietly or without using offensive language in every sentence that leaves their mouths along with continuously playing loud music."

"The student population is increasing to unbearable amounts already in this area and they do not need any further encouragement or welcoming into our community because they bring nothing positive."

"Our community is being destroyed and controlled by the universities and their students."

Well I'm sorry but I completely disagree with all of that.  It is full of gross generalisations and is frankly offensive to the many people in Oxford who are students or staff at either of its world-class Universities.  To say students bring nothing positive is utter nonsense - how do people think local business remain viable and vibrant?  I don't just mean bars either - I mean buses, restaurants, supermarkets, local shops and much more.  How many people in Oxford would become unemployed if out two Universities disappeared? I would, as would the leader of the council and many thousands more local people.  The other thing to consider is that if purpose-built student accommodation is provided then this reduces pressure on more conventional housing that could then be used for families and other social groupings.  In principle I think purpose-built student accommodation is a vital part of the accommodation mix in Oxford and the more of it we can have (so long as it is appropriate in scale, site etc.) the more we will reduce the massive housing pressure Oxford suffers.

We have students in our street and they are mostly quiet, considerate and well-spoken.  Occasionally we hear them late at night and occasionally they hear us.  That's a consequence of living in a crowded City with densely built accommodation - for me it's a fair swap for all the wonderful things there are about Oxford.  At last night's Central South and West area forum there were many students present with positive contributions to make and showing genuine interest for local issues of concern.  I was extremely impressed that OUSU, the Oxford University Student Union, is organising an-on street collection for the new Crisis Skylight Centre in Oxford this weekend.  Students do many good things for our City and many volunteer for all sorts of community outreach.  You can read lots about this on the site of the Oxford Hub.

On this particular planning application I will retain an open mind  - there may be reasons to refuse it if it gets called in and there may not.  As chair of Planning Review Committee I'll have to study it more carefully.  But I can say this without any doubt:  I will not be making any decision in either direction just because this is accommodation intended for students.  To do so would show complete disregard for planning law and would be frankly stupid.

The language I have read in emails sounds horribly like the racism of the 60s, the homophobia of the 80s and the sexism of the 70s.  I wonder - would people oppose an afro-Caribbean resource and advice centre, or an LGBT resource and advice centre, on that site with such gross and frankly disgusting generalisations.  They might find themselves on the wrong side of the law if they did.

Central South and West Area Forum

This forum met today in the Town Hall and focussed on student safety issues as well as homelessness.  It was really good to have Lesley Dewhurst from Oxford Homeless Pathways present to explain to us all the good work her charity does.  We also have the new manager from the Oxford Crisis Skylight Centre to tell us about all the good work just about to start in the Old Fire Station.   Lesley produced the best handout I have seen for ages that shows really well how the homelessness services work in Oxford.  How refreshing not to be blinded by high-tech graphics.  Click on the image here to see it in its full glory!

There was a presentation about student safety from the City Council community safety ream and some useful comments from the many students present .  Student input, particularly from the OUSU Vice-President for Charities and Communities , Daniel Stone, is always particularly welcome as it can be hard to build meaningful and sustainable channels of communication between the council and the University sometimes..  I was alarmed to hear a story about a sexual assault on a student in a bus but pleased that the City Council student safety team will take up the issue with the Police and the bus operator.

A useful meeting about HMO licensing

I had a meeting today with Tim Sadler, Executive Director City Services, and Ian Wright, Health Development Service Manager in Environmental Development.  My colleagues Cllr Mark Mills and Cllr John Goddard also attended.  The subject of the meeting was to discuss the problems and unintended consequences that are occurring with the City-wide licensing of Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs).

The discussion centred around the inflexibility of the Amenities and Facilities guide.  I made a statement in full council about one of these issues a while back and two more have since arisen:

In the first case we have a landlord who owns a few some modern executive houses (built in 2003/4) and has six tenants in each.  They have plenty of bathrooms and toilets and a huge kitchen/lounge communal area with which the tenants are all happy.  The problem is that for six tenants the dreaded document insists on an extra sink (or a sink and a dishwasher).  The tenants are happy with one sink and don't want either another sink or a dishwasher as this would reduce the cupboard space available to them for storage of their own personal food.  The council is however insisting this work be done against the wishes both of the tenants and the landlord.  This seems bonkers to me and only creates expense for the landlord that will inevitably be passed to the tenants in the next rent rise.  See the ground floor plan on the left.

The second case is even more bizarre.  This is another house with six tenants.  It has two bathrooms, each of which contain a toilet.  You'd think that would be fine as the guide says that for 1-4 tenants one bathroom that contains a toilet is sufficient.  But no - for six people if you have two bathrooms that both contain a toilet you also have to have a separate toilet.  I understand that toiled has now been fitted after the issue was forced by the council -  in a room that opens onto the kitchen, as one of the options the council suggested.  The tenants hate it and never use it because of the smell into the kitchen and obvious hygiene issue.   The work the council has imposed again strikes me as a waste of money and another inevitable rent rise.  I really don't see why the house can't be treated as two groups of three people with a toilet-containing bathroom for each group.

My real issue with all this - both these cases, and the one I talked about at full council - is that these are groups of consenting and non-vulnerable adults sharing a house in a responsible and neighbourly way, with good relationships with their landlords.  One of them even said to me: "As a landlord it is my policy to provide almost anything my tenants ask for.  They are, after all, my customers.  Thus, for example, if one tells me that their mattress is uncomfortable I don't even check it myself.  If they say it is uncomfortable...it is; so I change it.   A quick phone call to my supplier who delivers and takes away the old one is easy and not very expensive.  It makes good business sense to treat tenants well.  I even turned out to fix a leak on Christmas Day.  The tenants really do not want these things that Council officers are forcing us to do."

The council is not protecting tenants in these cases - it is making problems and rent rises when there were no problems and everyone was happy.  This is absolutely classic Labour behaviour:  We'll decide what's best for you and make sure you have it - even if you don't want it! This attempt to impose a one-size fits all policy on a complex situation where one set of guidelines clearly does not fit all situations is just causing unnecessary expense and waste for landlords and rent rises for tenants in a not exactly financially buoyant time of the economic cycle.  Tenancies come in many different forms - some are room by room, some are whole-house, some have individual locks on rooms, some don't.

I am of course all in favour of pursuing landlords who are negligent, don't keep their properties in good repair and treat their tenants badly.  These are not examples of that though - these tenants are financially capable working people who choose to live in high quality HMOs because they can't afford to live in other way in Oxford with housing being in such short supply and so expensive.  The landlords are providing essential accommodation for the people of Oxford and running decent, honest businesses doing it.  In many cases this is to fund retirement - which seems entirely reasonable to me.  If the landlords were not treating the tenants well they would move out!

There are two ends of the HMO spectrum in Oxford.  At one end you have cases like those I've mentioned and at the other end you have run-down, damp, cold, overcrowded properties with vulnerable tenants with few choices.  In my mind THESE are the places where council intervention is welcome and essential.  But it really is not welcome or needed when landlord and tenants were happy and everything was fine - it is not the job of the council to disrupt perfectly good and safe arrangements between good landlords and non-vulnerable tenants.  The Labour council should be arguing about numbers of cockroaches in some properties - not numbers of sinks or toilets in places where everyone is happy!

This was put rather well by one of the landlords at the last full council also:

"I would ask that the council focus on the highest risk properties and are not deflected by technical breaches of guidelines. That they use scarce resources and strong enforcement powers to protect vulnerable tenants and do not waste their energies on nitpicking .... Please avoid the temptation to consider being a landlord as a life choice of the more unsavoury end of the spectrum."

She is absolutely right! I really want this council to accept that decent, honest landlords actually provide vital housing for many of Oxford's students and young professionals.  These good landlords want the bad landlords brought to account just as much as the council and we councillors do.  The problem is that it feels like the council is currently treating all landlords like the enemy - when the council writes to them for example wouldn't a few sentences in the letter acknowledging the important contribution they are making to the City's housing needs be quite useful?  It might achieve a much better relationship and much better outcomes.

Both of the landlords quoted above have told me they are seriously considering getting out of the business because it is too much hassle.  Neither is young and both are providing good quality accommodation that Oxford desperately needs.  I think it would be a real tragedy if the Labour council's actions pushed these and others out of what is actually an essential business in Oxford thereby removing even more housing stock for young professionals and students who are an absolutely vital part of the economy of our City.

LibDem Group Meeting

We had a meeting of the Lib Dem Group on the City Council today.  We talked about our manifesto for next year and some of the excellent candidates we have lined up.  The meeting was very positive and left me encouraged for the upcoming few months leading up to the elections in 2012.

Three licensing hearings

I was called up at the last minute to join a panel to hear three license applications/variations today.  It was rather annoying as I'd just got home but I cycled back to the Town Hall in about 8 minutes! The applications were:

1.  Kebab Kid on St. Clement's

This application was for a licence to service takeaway food well into the small hours (5am at the weekends) and act as a takeaway.  There were objections from residents and Police concerned with noise in a very residential area and about the tendency for food outlets to be flashpoints for late night gathering of people and disturbance.  Eventually the panel granted reduced hours and imposed a condition requiring door supervisors to aid with dispersal on some evenings of the week.

2.  The Six Bells in Headington Quarry

The was a short extension to hours as part of a revamp of the premises by the brewery.  The panel granted the application as requested and I made sure that none of the extensions came into force until Januray 2012  (thus removing the possibility of using the extra hours in the busy December period, prior to renovation) and also that although the venue could open until 1am on some evenings, it would not be possible to admit new customers after midnight - this is to avoid people leaving other local pubs at their closing time and making a noise walking along to the Six Bells.

3.  The Viking Sports and Social Club in Old Headington

This was really just a regularisation of of existing practice due to technicalities in licensing law and the 2003 Act.  There was some confusion among local residents and indeed the applicant about what their existing club licence covered and about the ability of the licensing panel to change the number of Temporary Event Notices (TENs) that can be used.  TENs are entirely outside the remit of the Council so discussing them was actually a red-herring that caused considerable confusion.  Eventually agreement was reached and I was pleased that we had asked that the club notify neighbours of their yearly plan for events and also notify if any events were added to the calendar later in the year, after it was published.

I left the Town Hall around 8.15pm.  There was one more hearing to do but I couldn't do that as it was for an application in Carfax Ward, the one I represent.

Please note this post does not form an official record of proceedings and should not be treated as such.  The decision notices from the City Council are the definitive documents.

Licensing and Gambling Acts Committee

This was quite a brief meeting.  It included the quarterly report of licensing activity which was presented ably and usefully as ever by Julian Alison, the City Council Licensing Manager.

Most of the meeting focussed on discussion of the government proposals to deregulate lots of forms of licensable entertainment.  While I welcome reduction of red tape I do feel the current regime does give the City Council some very useful and effective tools to make sure the right balance between people's right to quiet enjoyment of their homes and licence-holders' rights to run their businesses.  I don't feel the City Council over-uses or abuses this at the moment.

In principle while I support deregulating where it is safe to do so, I am clear that local authorities do need to have sufficient legislation behind them to be able to properly balance the needs of all people in this City be they those who want to party into the small hours or those that want to sleep in the small hours so they can study or work in the morning.

I do welcome any change that will allow schools, colleges, Universities, charities etc. to be less hindered by legislation when they want to run what are essentially low-risk problem-free events but I do worry about losing control over some bigger and more problematic venues and/or events.  You can read about the proposed changes on the Department for Culture Media and Sport's web site.

The Frideswide Civic Service

October is definitely a month of ceremony, being the start of the year for many parts of Oxford life.  The Frideswide service is an annual event that marks the founding of Oxford by St. Frideswide sometime around the 7th or 8th Century of the Common Era.  There is a good BBC article which tells you more about this.

The service is at Christ Church in the Cathedral and this year focussed on Care of Creation.  We heard three local folk interviewed by the Bishop of Dorchester.  Averil Stedeford has made her house in Headington very green and it is now quite famous.  Malcolm McCulloch, an Oxford academic talked about the green aspects of his research and Jenny Creese spoke about the Connecting Naturally project.

Part of the service involves a big procession to say prayers for St. Frideswide and also leave sprigs of rosemary on her tomb, as a mark of remembrance.

The glove ceremony and court sermon

The glove ceremony which takes place in the Dean's drawing room at Christ Church is a symbolic event of uncertain origin. It may be that white gloves were presented to the High Court judge if there were no crimes for him to try on his visit. These days a pair of white gloves are presented to him both by the Lord Mayor of Oxford and by Oxford University. It is a very grand affair with Heads of Houses, vice-chancellor, Registrar, Proctors and more all present.

This is a very traditional event that marks the start of the legal year in Oxford. It used to mark the
annual start of the "Assizes" - the title of a visit by the a High Court Judge to dispose of criminal and civil business in the county. The Assizes were abolished by the 1971 courts act. These days High Court Judges still visit Oxford but now sit in the Crown Court. The service is now known as the court sermon and the preacher is appointed by Oxford University's Summoner of preachers - usually a college chaplain.

These types of event don't really do much in terms of day to day politics but they are important traditions that I think keep Oxford the great and fascinating City it is today.  I was pleased to attend with around 5 other members of the City Council.

Full Council

This was another long meeting.  I'm afraid I didn't stay for all of it - I left around 8pm when a Labour Councillor started shouting at a Green Councillor.  We were in the final bit of the meeting where motions are debated and this never achieves anything as the council has a majority and the outcome of motions is very predictable.  You can see a recording of the whole meeting at http://www.oxford.gov.uk/PageRender/decCD/FullCouncilMeetingVideo10October2011.htm and the Agenda and other details are also available.

I was pleased to see Mrs Judy Crompton at the meeting - she is a good local landlord who treats her tenants (one of whom she had with her) extremely well.  She gave a good speech about the HMO licensing scheme and I think it explained very well how although the scheme is a good thing in principle, it is being applied to the wrong landlords.  As she said, "Please avoid the temptation to consider being a landlord as a life choice of the more unsavoury end of the spectrum" and I think really importantly,

" It certainly does seem from the wording of motion 3 that the council sees landlords as wild beasts who must be captured, tamed and kept chained and under control. I, personally, and as a representative of my colleagues, find this unhelpful and, as a council tax payer who personally pays council tax on 6 properties, I also feel that this attitude and the “tarring of all with the same brush” an unhelpful attitude which wastes my money. I expect a more measured tone from my paid representatives.".

I entirely agree with Judy on this.  HMO licensing is being applied far too bluntly.  We have officers pursuing landlords to do work to properties that is not safety-related and that their tenants don't want while at the same time there are other properties that are damp, cockroach-infested and vastly overcrowded.    It staggers me to see that they are not getting prioritised over the many excellent properties that are now being ruined in appearance (being made to look more like hostels) by the ridiculous demands being made by the huge HMO team.  I consider it a public disgrace.

A sneak preview of the new Crisis Centre at the Old Fire Station

Oxford City Council and Crisis, the national charity for single homeless people, have been working together for some time to plan the redevelopment and refurbishment of the Old Fire Station building in central Oxford.

Along with Cllr Stephen Brown, my ward colleague, and Cllr Mark Mills (Holywell ward) I was taken on a tour of the building as it currently is.  It is looking very impressive - very clean and some ingenious use of space to create some very useful art rooms as well as accommodation and a café.   I am particularly impressed with the way the hose tower has been preserved and made visible again.

By autumn 2011 the Old Fire Station will open and be home to a Crisis Skylight Centre and Café and Arts at the Old Fire Station, a brand new arts company. The two organisations are independent but will work alongside each other to achieve the mutual goal of encouraging integration and collaboration between the cultural and homeless communities in Oxford.

Arts at the Old Fire Station will develop partnership projects with Crisis clients, as well as offering professional development for artists, and creative activities for the general public. This “two organisations, one building” model has been developed to offer exciting opportunities for artistic collaborations between the homeless and cultural communities of the city.

The newly developed Old Fire Station will also accommodate a brand new Skylight Café, which will operate as a social enterprise, providing a route into employment for homeless and vulnerably housed adults.

I think the project is a really exciting one and think it will be a real asset to the Gloucester Green area of Oxford, hopefully encouraging some regeneration and re-use of some of the currently vacant retail units in the area.

Some of the text and one picture in this post are taken from a very useful Crisis newsletter.

Oxford Homeless Pathways (OxHOP) 25 years celebration

This was a joyous and extremely well-attended lunchtime event at the Town Hall.  It was celebrating 25 years of amazing work by all those involved in OxHOP.  There was a great speech by Lesley Dewhurst, the Chief Executive, who has been with OxHOP almost all of its life and some really inspiring and moving stories from previous and current users of all that OxHOP provides.

What I like about OxHOP is that it is a holistic service that helps people right from providing emergency shelter at O'Hanlon House (called the Oxford Nigh Shelter before it was rebuilt) to second stage homeless housing via Julian Housing.  The support, encouragement and dignity that OxHOP offers to some of the most vulnerable people in our great city is truly amazing and very humbling.  It was a pleasure to attend the event.

Planning Review Committee: Grove Street Housing

We met today to discuss this one planning application that had been called in.  I was glad the St. Clements car park planning application had not been called in as I considered that the decision had been made properly and thoroughly at the West Area Planning Committee.

The application was to demolish an already half-derelict club, the Grove Street Club, and replace it with four terraced houses (one with four bedrooms and three with three).  The West Area Planning Committee had voted approve the application but I was willing to agree with my North Oxford colleagues that a reconsideration was warranted as there were some serious concerns around sizes of gardens and lack of parking.

There was a presentation from the Planning Officer, two speeches against the application and one in favour from the applicant's agent.  After some discussion the committee voted 4 in favour of the application and 3 against.  I realised that as chair I could either abstain or vote against and use my casting vote to cause a refusal.  I didn't consider that the grounds for refusal were strong enough not to be quashed at appeal so I reluctantly abstained thus allowing the application to be approved.  Losing an appeal against an unreasonable refusal can result in costs being awarded to the applicant against the council and that does nobody any favours.

I had held the meeting in the council chamber as I believe it is better for smaller matters and makes the public feel more included.  Apart from the sound system being not put out at all for the planning officers and then set too loud I thought things proceeded well.  I was sorry the planning officers didn't enjoy presenting in the council chamber.  Personally I think it makes for better democracy for small planning applications.

Redevelopment plans for Luther Court

I went to an interesting exhibition today about a2dominion's plans for redevelopment of Luther Court. This is an area of social housing in a difficult and constrained part of the City Centre and it would be fair to say it has been the victim, and site of, a lot of antisocial behaviour over the years. It comprises of lots of rather small and poky one-bedroomed flats that I'm sure are not ideal for the well-being both mental and physical of their tenants.  Currently the accommodation all faces, and has its access from, the North East side facing onto Luther Street Medical Centre and O'Hanlon House.  I think it would be fair to say that the interaction of some potential clients unable to be accepted by the Medical Centre or O'Hanlon House, and some of the more vulnerable tenants in the current Luther Court has not always produced optimal outcomes.  (click the image below to see a non-squashed version of it!)



The new plan is to demolish the current accommodation and to rebuild it on more levels and facing South West onto Thames Street with access only from that side.  The new accommodation would include more two- and possibly three-bedroomed units suitable for small families and would be to much higher standards of building, light provision and so on.  There is a plan to include lots of secure bike parking and  some student accommodation.  The development would be completely car-free and residents would be excluded from having City Centre residents' parking permits.

I filled in a comment sheet and made the following points:

• While I welcome purpose-built student accommodation, particularly in the City Centre, I do think it works better if there is a resident warden to nip any behaviour or noise issues in the bud.  It was indicated that this would probably be done by utilising more mature residents in return for a reduce rent.


• I hope the development will utilise renewable energy including Solar Thermal and/or PV systems as these work incredibly well even in our climate and can make a real difference to social tenants struggling to pay ever-increasing fuel bills.  Anything that can keep people out a fuel poverty is a good thing in my book!


• I welcome this consultation event and encourage a2dominion to have lots more making sure local residents are informed and invited widely and that communication with all local stakeholders is maintained


• I asked also that a2dominion take into account the wishes of their current tenants in Luther Court carefully and sensitively.  I believe they will and offered to help in any way I can as ward councillor.

As these plans are worked up and come to the planning permission stage I will of course have to back away and keep an open mind about any plans that are actually submitted to the planning process in case I have to take part in a determination of the planning application at a committee.  At this stage though I think can honestly, and without prejudicing myself, say things look promising!

I am grateful to a2dominion for keeping me informed as a local councillor at this early stage of planning what could be a really effective and exciting new development.

St Clements Car Park: Call in FAILS

Well the 5pm deadline has passed and only 8 councillors requested a call-in. It needs 12 for a call-in so it fails. This means the council can go ahead and issue the refusal of planning permission but it does of course remain open to the applicant to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

I think not calling this in was the right decision as I believe West Area Planning committee last week was run openly and fairly and got to its decision in a correct and proper way.

Battle of Britain day service

I was asked to attend this service today to represent the City Council as The Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor were unavailable.  It was a real honour to be asked and as well as commemorating all that the military of the time had given in the Battle of Britain in 1940 I was also asked to "inspect" the dozen or so young people present from the 150 (City of Oxford) Squadron of the Royal Air Force Cadets.  I also gave one of the gospel readings

It was great to chat to young people with a real sense of duty and direction and I was impressed at how impeccably turned out they were.  Seeing one of them process with the flag in the service reminded me of my childhood as a cub scout and then a scout as we used to do that in church at parade Sundays.  I think it's a shame so much of that tradition is fading away - it's great to remember our heritage and commemorate all our forces have done for us to make us the free country we are today.  I don't buy arguments about being disrespectful to other cultures.  We have a great country and I think we should celebrate that, welcome all to join in as they wish!

Well done Oxford ATC and well done St. Michael at the Northgate for hosting an excellent service which had just the right balance of reverence and accessibility!

The saga of St Clements - tweets and many emails

Some readers will know that I like to tweet (Twitter -  @tonybrett) about things going on in the council as I believe it makes for more open and accountable democracy.  As I was just an audience member at West Area Planning  I tweeted about it in some detail.  BBC Radio Oxford picked up on this and rang me at home at 0640 on Thursday morning for comments and an interview about the process.  I was happy to oblige although I must say getting a phone call at 0640 did make me think for a fleeting moment that someone must have died!  Thankfully that was not the case and I was able to explain how call-in works.

Since then there have been a lot of emails to all councillors asking us not to call in the planning application.  I am sending a standard response which I hope is explaining how things progress from here.  The decision was published on Friday morning which means there must be call in requests from 12 City Councillors if the application is to be re-determined at a meeting of the Planning Review Committee, which I chair.  At the moment I have seen five call in requests but there may be more that have not been shared with other councillors. Here's what I've sent (not the picture!) :

Dear <name>,

The application has not been called in.

Some councillors have requested a call in but as far as I am aware only five have done that so far.  The application will only be called in if twelve councillors have requested that by 5pm on Monday 19th September.

It is possible for the Head of City Development to call the application in also, within that same deadline, but there is no indication of that happening at this stage.

It is not my intention to support the call in as I believe West Area committee was run fairly and properly but we must accept that it is the democratic right of other councillors to do so if they feel that's what those they represent want them to do.

I am keeping an open mind about the acceptability or otherwise of the development as I am the chair of Planning Review Committee and will need to be able to chair a discussion openly and fairly if the call-in succeeds.

I hope this explains things at what I of course understand must be a stressful time.

Yours,

Tony Brett

West Area Planning Committee - St Clements

I attended this meeting tonight as I value seeing how others chair meetings and how discussion of planning applications proceeds.  Oscar is a good chair and it's good to learn techniques from him.

Among others, today's West Area Planning considered the controversial application to build student accommodation on the St. Clement's car park. There were some very impassioned speeches from many parties and it was clear that the opposers had really brought the cavalry with some very respected planning consultants, senior folk from local businesses and from the Queen's College.

There seemed to be several areas of discussion. These included access to Angel and Greyhound Meadow, proximity to Queens' College's listed Florey Building, the quality of the buildings proposed and the impact on local traders of the removal of the parking facility (in total during building and then reduced after completion).

Many councillors asked excellent questions and made very good and valid points both against and in favour of the application. Eventually there was motion to refuse planning permission, proposed by Oscar Van Nooijen (the chair) and seconded by Graham Jones (Lib Dem St. Clements' councillor). Five voted in favour of the motion (Cllrs Jones, Benjamin, Van Nooijen, Goddard, Gotch) with four against the motion (Cllrs Price, Cook, Khan and Tanner). The motion thus passed and planning permission was refused.

The council procedures mean that there is a 2 working day period during which the decision can be called in for a second (and fresh) consideration at Planning Review Committee.

Run down and abandoned buildings on George Street

I had a call from someone the other who had noticed some buildings on George Street in a terrible state.  They are all disused shop units and I agree with the caller that they really give a terrible impression of the City Centre so I am trying to find out who owns the building(s) and if there is a way to encourage or force them to do something about the awful eyesores that they have become.   All I have found out so far is that Oxford City Council does not own this building, but planning records indicate that the ownership lays with OXAM, OMCRG, 13-14 Broad St, Oxford OX1 3BP.

Internet searches seem to reveal:

Andre Stern, Karina Sonnenberg
OMCRG Broad Street Oxford,
OX1 3AY
GBR
tel: +44 1865 248 248
fax: +44 1865 249 249

I will continue to investigate...

Is Labour neglecting the Covered Market?

This is a piece of casework about which I won't say too much as I don't want to identify individuals.  Stephen Brown, my ward colleague has also been involved in it.  The story is that covered market traders can have a store room in the cellars below the market and that another trader has a leak in their floor which is causing damage to equipment and stock belonging to other traders as well as the obvious Health and Safety issues around slipping and mixing water and electricity.

I am very disappointed that the City Council administration appears to have been dragging its feet over forcing the offending trader to fix this problem for an extremely long time now.  This is despite large rises in Covered Market rents that traders are expected to pay.  If they paid their rents as slowly as the City Council is fixing this problem I think there would be trouble.

All I want is for Oxford Labour to play fair and make sure the traders get safe and dry storage in return for the huge rents they pay to the City Council, the owner of the Covered Market.

Blessing Service for St. Giles' Fair

I was invited to represent the City Council as Ward Councillor at the traditional service of blessing of St. Giles' Fair this year as the Lord Mayor, Deputy Lord Mayor and Sheriff were all unavailable.  It was an honour to do this, accompanying Bob Wilkes, the City Rector and Vicar of St. Michael at the Northgate; and Andrew Bunch, Vicar of St. Giles' Church on one of the rides in leading messages of welcome and a bible reading.  It was great fun to sing some hymns to the pipe organ that you can see in the picture, as well as singing some to the rather better-paced Salvation Army musicians!

Planning Review Committee: Old Road Campus

The second  Planning Review Committee that I have chaired.  This was a reconsideration of the East Area Planning Committee's decision to grant planning permission to Oxford University to build a new research building on the Roosevelt Drive site near Old Road.  I am a member and employee of Oxford University so I had to consider carefully whether I could approach the decision with an open mind.  As I work for the central IT department of Oxford University and have nothing to do (in my work, rather than councillor, capacity) with the estates department and have no vested interest in the Medical Sciences Division I decided that although I clearly had a personal interest in the matter it was not enough to prejudice me as there are many thousands of people in our City who have some relationship or another with Oxford University.

The meeting proceeded smoothly with some very well-considered and well-presented evidence and opinions both from objectors and applicants.  The Planning Officer, Felicity Byrne presented very well and brought along a County Council Highways Officer (Martin Kraftl) to talk about the possibilities with regard to controlled parking zones.  The professional advice was extremely useful, as always.

After quite a bit of debate and careful questioning of all parties there was eventually a motion to approve the planning application with some additional conditions and that passed so the permission is granted.   The additional conditions are:

• That the landscaping to the tree belt on Old Road includes new hedge and tree planting to the western edge, and mixed evergreens to the eastern end;


• That the hours for deliveries during the construction of the development be controlled to avoid peak hours and the beginning of the school day;


• That the external lighting to the campus be designed to avoid Light spillage, in order to prevent nuisance being caused to nearby residential properties;


• That details of the maintenance regime for the attenuation tanks to be used in the drainage systems be submitted for approval by officers.

I hope these will go as far as possible in alleviating some of the concerns of the objectors.

Old Road Campus Site Visit

This is another planning application called in to Planning Review committee.  This time from East Area Planning Committee.

Quite a few councillors visited the site and we also took time to view the scene from Bickerton Road and from the garden and some rooms of a local resident's house that she very kindly gave us access to.

This was again an extremely informative visit that I think will make sure planning review committee next week makes as informed a decision as it can.

Planning Review Committee is turning out to be quite a lot of work but I do think it is important to consider applications properly as they have a big and lasting effect on many people in our City.  The work is also enjoyable and interested and it's an honour to be the chair of such an important committee.  I am grateful to my Labour colleagues for allowing me to have it.

Planning Review Committee: Mill Street Student Block

And so we get to the Planning Review Commitee meeting that will reconsider the planning decision made at the last West Area Committee.  This is the first Planning Review Committee meeting I've chaired as the first meeting happened while I was in Bonn on the twinning trip.  I was very keen to get things right so ran the meeting as carefully and inclusively as I could.

I should point out that "review" is a slightly confusing name for this committee as its job is not to review the previous decision and the process followed to reach it, but rather to take a fresh look at the planning application and make a new decision based on all the evidence presented.

All objectors had time to speak as did the applicant's agent.  The planning officer (Murray Hancock) gave a very informative and useful report and though he was recommending approval, that is just one of the opinions we as a committee were to consider.  We had some debate among councillors and then a motion was put  seconded to refuse the application and this received almost unanimous assent.  The application was thus refused.

.

Mill Street Site Visit

One of the planning applications that was approved on 13 July at West Area Planning Committee was for some accommodation for students of a local college to fit in a strip of land between the back of houses on Mill Street and the railway, just south of Oxford Station.  At West Area Planning Committee councillors and officers had largely spoken highly of it and it was given planning permission (although not unanimously).

The council has a procedure after such decisions where if 12 councillors request it the decision is "called in" and get re-determined at Planning Review Committee.  That happened in this case.  I am chair of the Planning Review Committee so decided that we should actually visit the site to see how things would look from the neighbouring properties and well as from other angles.  Quite a few members of the committee attended the visit and we were accompanied by Murray Hancock, one of the City Council's senior planners, as well as some local residents and the agent for the applicant so he could let us onto the site.

I found the visit extremely informative and instructive and I think councillors much better equipped to made informed decisions in the actual committee meeting.

There was some controversy over the accuracy of pictures submitted and I was slightly amused at this one (although the whole issue is of course a serious one) as I think it looks like the mockup of the propsed building is floating in the air!

Electronic Committee Management

I attended a brief training session today about the new software the City Council is adopting to better manage information about committees and councillors.  I have to say I was quite impressed with it.  It should make finding things much easier for the public and it will hold us councillors better to account as it records meeting attendance too!

West Area Planning Committee

I attended this meeting today as I wanted to see the outcome of the planning application to change the use of three shop units in Gloucester Green to A3 food use.  The meeting was ably chaired by Oscar Van Nooijen and there was some good discussion on all the applications considered.  The biggest item on the agenda was the St. Clements' Car park application but that was deferred.

Much discussion ensued on the Gloucester Green application and the voting was a dead heat.  I am pleased that Oscar used his casting vote as chair to decline the permission as I think three extra late-night food outlets in that area would have caused intolerable problems for the residents of the flats on Gloucester Green (the Chilterns).

The meeting papers are available online.

Full Council

Today was Elise Benjamin's first full council as Lord Mayor and thus chair of the meeting.  It was not too long a meeting and had the normal political gesturing and grandstanding.  Following some actual and anecdotal evidence about a worrying trend of landlords pulling out of the HMO market, I made the following statement on notice:

"Lord Mayor, I want to make a brief statement about the implementation of new additional HMO licensing scheme. While I recognise and fully support the vital work of holding landlords to account and ensuring adequate and safe conditions for tenants I do want to sound a note of caution about discouraging landlords to stay in the HMO market.



Oxford is a lively and vibrant City and has a large population of young people trying to make their way after School, College or University.  Housing is scarce and expensive and living in HMOs is the only way many such people can afford to stay in Oxford.  I have seen one example (next to my own home) and heard of others where I wonder if perhaps this council is requiring more work than is strictly necessary on properties that are being used as-built (i. e. with no extra bedrooms or partitions, or rooms being used as bedrooms that were intended for other use), and to modern building regulations standards. While I of course understand the duty of care the council has to HMO-residents I hope that will be kept in balance with the need to maintain a supply of HMOs for those who are not able to afford to live in our wonderful City of Oxford any other way. Our City's economy is strong and healthy and this is due in no small part to the number of skilled professionals that live here.  I would hate to get into a position where they can no longer afford to live in Oxford because too many landlords have chosen to leave the HMO market.



It is a delicate balance and I certainly have no sympathy for landlords that don't look after their properties ensuring they are safe for their tenants, nor for tenants who engage in antisocial behaviour.   On the other hand I don't want to see tenants who are responsible members of the community who do not keep neighbours awake, do not have loud parties, do not abuse parking and properly manage their refuse and recycling to be the unintentional victims of a licensing regime that is meant to protect them, not drive their landlords out of the rental market and therefore them out of their homes.



I am grateful to officers for taking the time to discuss this issue with me in the last week or so and grateful for all the excellent work they are doing in bringing Oxford HMO stock up to a good and safe standard.  I also welcome the fact that the council has taken my comments on board and I'm sure officers will bear them in mind when making future assessments of works required to recently-built and/or non-overcrowded residential dwellings.  I will be asking the portfolio member for housing for an update in a question to council later in the year on progress in this important and delicately-balanced area.



Thank you"

Cllr Ed Turner gave me a constructive reply on behalf of the administration and I do hope the administration will make sure the HMO policy is applied in a sensible way in future - Oxford cannot afford to lose all its HMO stock.

Licensing Training

This was an all-day event for which I and lots of others took a day's leave.  It was led by Barrister Leo Charalambides of Ely Place Chambers Licensing Group.  We covered lots of ground and it was pleasing to hear a case that we had covered in the past referred to by Leo as an example of good practice that he often quotes when training others.

It was all quite technical, but also very practical stuff.  I entirely approve of the advice to know your own authority's statement of licensing policy well, and this particularly applies to me as my name is on it!

There was also some good advice about how to lay decisions out clearly, with their evidential basis, as this would hopefully make them more robust to appeal.

It was extremely useful having a day to reflect on licensing while not actually having a licensing decision to make and it was also fascinating hearing what a Barrister had to say when he wasn't representing an applicant in a license hearing.  I am grateful to Leo for being so frank, honest and helpful.

Planning briefing

This was an interesting session, put on for councillors about some new planning law that is currently being discussed in parliament.  It felt a bit odd to be having a theoretical discussion about something that's not even law yet but I guess it was useful nonetheless.

Code of Conduct Training

A 90 minute training session today reminding us about the need to declare interests and the need to be consistent in doing so.

We also learned about pre-disposition and pre-determination and the difference between the two.

City Centre Neighbourhood Action Group

A useful meeting of the City Centre NAG today.  Nothing particularly exciting but it was good to meet the new OUSU VP for Charities and Community - conveniently also called Daniel like his successor!  Daniel Stone this time.

It's good to be keeping this link with Thames Valley Police open and it was good to meet the new City Centre Inspector, Katy Barrow-Grint.  You can see the current City Centre team on their web page.

Licensing and Gambling Acts Committee and General Purposes Licensing Committee

I attended both of these committees today although was last for the first as I had a work meeting that was longer than expected. I had attended the pre-meeting on Monday so I knew there was nothing too contentious.  I'm always impressed at how much hard work the licensing team does and how much they seem to get done.  You can read their update report on the council web site.

The General Purposes Licensing Committee was a bit more interesting and a few things a worthy of mention:

Firstly, my fellow LibDem councillor Gwynneth Royce made some excellent comments about having women represented on the taxi-licensing sub-committee (a panel of three councillors - two labour and one libdem).  It would be fair to say that the panel consists of three white, older males so is not very diverse.  I think diversity is always good on decision-making bodies and Jim Campbell pointed this out saying it's good to have to work with people who don't agree with you.  We resolved to invite both Labour and the LibDem group to consider if they might like to change their nominated councillors for this panel so as to make sure both sexes are represented.

Secondly, we discussed the issue of designation of streets for trading purposes.  We agreed to make all streets in the City "consent streets" which means that street trading has to have a licence from the City Council.  This is good because it will simply things and make issues such as on-street car selling on Cowley Road easier to deal with but the legislation has a very broad definition of "Street" so it may affect some food outlets in private car parks such as the one near Wickes on Botley Road and the one in the John Allen Centre at Cowley Centre.  We asked Officers to look carefully at this to see what could be done to mitigate the problem.

Finally we had a discussion about pavement trading stall as there is apparently a problem that the City's standard 1Mx2M is difficult for traders as the "standard" size you can buy is 1.3Mx2.4M (4ftx8ft).  I'm a bit worried that this represents over 50% increase in area but was assured that this will only be a discretionary increase when officers believe that the larger area is necessary for the type of items being sold (i.e. a flower stall may well need to be bigger than a jewellery stall).  Personally I don't like the stalls with large objects attached to the side of them either.  They clog up the street and impede pedestrian flow as well as being grossly outside the size limit.  Officers agreed to consider these carefully when doing enforcement.

The meeting finished soon after 7pm.

Town Twinning trip to Bonn

I’m just on the way home from a brilliant trip to Bonn, one of the towns with which Oxford is twinned.  The flight is delayed so I'm writing this.  There was a delegation of seven City Councillors and a few others from Oxford and I should say at this point that we all travelled at our own expense. I took Gordon, my partner too.  We flew into Cologne on Wednesday 1st June and visited the wonderful cathedral there before having a good lunch and getting the train South to Bonn.

The visit programme started at 5.30pm with a reception in the Stadhaus in Bonn and then had a welcome dinner at the old Rathaus, that is in the middle of a re-furb.

Day two consisted of a wonderful boat trip down the Rhine to Remargen, where there is the remains of a bridge that was very important towards the end of World War II and a museum about it.  We hopped across the river while we were there to a little village called Erpel and had a needed ice-cream.  We got the boat back to Bonn a bit later and spent the evening having a nice meal in a Turkish restaurant with our hosts, Elmar Konrads-Hassel and his wife Ursula Hassel.

Day three started at the Stadhaus with an interesting seminar about all the fair trade activity that Bonn and its council takes part in.  We share Oxford experiences and were all presented with some fair trade coffee.  Lunch followed and then we had a free afternoon.  Gordon and I used that time to visit the cathedral in Bonn and the Beethoven memorial as well as the protestant church.  We went on after that to the Scholsskirche (the University Church) for an excumenical service that was held in both English and German.  I was pleased to be able to take part in the prayers of intercession, fortunately in English!  We then processed in our robes to the Bonn Oxford Club where we were treated to a barbecue supper and entertainment by the Oxford Fiddle Group, another part of the English delegation visiting Bonn.

Day four was an incredibly hot day so worked well for the Bürgerfest where lots of groups both from Bonn and Oxford gave performances.  The Bonn Irish dancers were among them as were the group from the Pegasus Theatre and the Oxford Fiddle Group.  Gordon and I visited the Beethoven Haus in the afternoon where an really excellent audio guide (thankfully in English) gave me a real sense of a tour through the great composer’s life from start to finish.  There was also a very modern 3D rendition of some scenes from Fidelio where the singers were 3D shapes and we could move them around to hear the change in musical effect.  We briefly visited the Arithmeum, a fascinating collection of mathematical and arithmetical instruments.  We didn’t have long there as it shut at 6pm.  The final evening’s entertainment was as the Haus den Karnevals where we were fed again and then took part in a sort of gig called Losst mer Singe – where we had to join in with a band singing carnival songs in a local dialect called Bönnsch.

Our last day started with another wonderful breakfast from our hosts and then a trip to a fairly new museum of  the history of Germany.  It covered the period from 1945 right up to the current day and gave a fascinating insight in the German Democratic Republic (from 1949-1989) and the Federal Republic of Germany and how reunification had come about.  I was interested to hear about the struggles of the former GDR to adapt to the economic freedoms enjoyed by the Federal Republic.  We finished off our trip by taking our hosts to lunch at Restaurant am Rheinaue (basically a lea on the Rhine).

I was extremely pleased to be able to attend this twinning trip and I feel I know some of my fellow councillors in Oxford much better now, as well as having made some wonderful new friends in Germany.  I do think that twinning is great for Cities and brings about an international dimension to their civic lives.  It’s also great to be able to take young people along such as those from the Pegasus Theatre as I think such things hugely broaden their horizons.

I look forward both to welcoming new friends from Bonn back to Oxford and to visiting Bonn and other twins of Oxford and strongly encourage other councillors and members of community groups to do the same.  It’s definitely well worth the effort and expense of the travel.  The youngest member of our group was still at primary school and the oldest over 90 so there are no excuses!