Consultation on changes to Woodstock Road near Radcliffe Observatory Quarter

I've just received an incredibly helpful email from a highways engineer in the County Council.  It is a pre-consultation on the proposals for making Woodstock Road safer and more attractive in the area of the development that Oxford University is undertaking on the site of the old Radcliffe Infirmary.  It starts:

"The University of Oxford is currently redeveloping the former Radcliffe Infirmary Hospital site adjacent to Woodstock Road and has provided funding to Oxfordshire County Council for improvements to the highway adjacent to the site. The new development will have two pedestrian through routes linking Woodstock Road and Walton Street on the northern and southern side of the site which will increase the number of pedestrians within the area.

The existing carriageway is of variable width with mandatory cycle lanes in both directions, bus stops and pay & display parking along the north western side. The buildings adjacent to Somerville College create a natural pinch-point and narrow the carriageway to approximately 8.5m which tends to help in reducing vehicle speeds.

Further north the road then widens to over 13.5m in the vicinity of the Royal Oak Public House making it difficult for pedestrians to cross, even during periods of low traffic flow.

The northbound bus stop has a modern glass and stainless steel shelter with Real Time journey Information (RTI) located within a 2.5m wide section of footway. The southbound stop has an old brick shelter poorly located at the back of a 2.1m wide footway and adjacent to a vehicle access. This shelter has no RTI and provides no forward visibility of approaching buses so passengers are forced to leave the shelter and stand outside where they reduce the usable width of footway."

There is then a list of proposals and a useful PDF that shows them in a more graphical form if, like me, you respond better to pictures than words!  Here are the proposals:

Widening the footways where possible to improve pedestrian movements within the area.

• Narrow the carriageway running lanes to 3.0m, this will help in encouraging lower vehicle speeds and reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians. To reduce the speed of approaching traffic this principle will be extended north to Observatory Street by applying a road surface treatment along the centreline.


• Maintain the existing 1.5m mandatory cycle lanes in both directions but replace the standard carriageway marking with a double row of cleft (rough) engineered granite setts 20mm high with tapered edges to discourage motorists from inadvertently entering the cycle lane.


• Use low height kerbs (50mm) within the general area to assist pedestrians when crossing especially for people with mobility problems with the exception of the bus stops which will have 120mm high kerbs to facilitate boarding and alighting.


• Relocate the southbound bus stop slightly further north to a wider area of footway and provide a new style shelter with improved visibility of approaching buses, capable of being fitted with RTI.


• Provide a flush central feature to act as a pedestrian refuge, similar to that used on Oxford High Street. This will allow pedestrians to cross an individual lane of traffic approaching from one direction at a time then wait in the central area before completing the crossing movement.


• Provide courtesy style crossings at the northern and southern limits to coincide with the link routes to Walton Street. This style of crossing has already been successfully used within Oxford Railway Station, Corn Street in Witney and Thame High Street. These flat topped humps will highlight pedestrian priority and will also be inlayed with engineered granite setts to give the appearance of a zebra crossing but without the need to provide unsightly zig-zag markings and flashing belisha beacons.


• The inclusion of enhanced crossing points will result in the loss of some on-street parking; all but four spaces will be re-located to the northern end of the scheme.


• The scheme will be sympathetic to the historical context of the adjacent buildings with improved paving, granite chippings in the road surface and reduced street clutter.

I'm very interested to hear people's view on this so please do let me know what you think.  Once the consultation is officially open I'll add the official consultation response details.  I should also remind you that under the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 the Council is obliged to make any representations received in formal response open to public inspection.  Please do go ahead and comment on this post - those comments will be public anyway but do not form part of the official consultation responses.

Labour spreading misinformation about benefits reform

I was horrified to read the column from the Labour Leader of the City Council in my copy of "Your Oxford" (the City Council's twice-yearly public information newspaper) as it makes some very basic errors about benefit reform and was nowhere near being balanced or even handed.

The two claims were that child benefit is going to be rolled into Universal Credit and that all claims for benefits will have to be made online under the new system. Both claims are just plain wrong and therefore in direct breach of the Code of Practice about such communications from the Department for Communities and Local Government. Paragraph 15 of that says:

"Local authorities should ensure that publicity relating to policies and proposals from
central government is balanced and factually accurate. Such publicity may set out the
local authority’s views and reasons for holding those views, but should avoid anything
likely to be perceived by readers as constituting a political statement, or being a
commentary on contentious areas of public policy."

I am pleased to say that the Council very quickly saw the error of its ways when I raised this matter and immediately stopped distributing the "Your Oxford" newspaper. It's an outrage that over 27,000 had already been delivered and that 60,000 had been printed.  This is going to be an awful lot of reprinting and I dread to think what it will cost the council.

I think it's terrible that Labour continually tries to use "Your Oxford" as a party political leaflet when it should confine itself to public information given in a balanced and informative way.  Scaremongering at public expense by distributing misinformation is just outrageous.  I will continue to pursue the council to find out how much the monumental cock-up will cost the public purse!

Since the date this happened there have been a few news stories about it - The Oxford Mail, and The Oxford Times ran it and I got to appear on BBC South Today about it as well as doing piece on BBC Radio Oxford's drive time.  My colleague Cllr Jean Fooks also had a letter in the Oxford Times about the issue.

Disgusting treatment of the Covered Market and Labour's contemptuous remarks

The Covered Market is one of the nicest things in Carfax Ward, the part of the Oxford I represent. I blogged last year about the terrible neglect of the place by the City Council and I'm getting increasingly worried that the appalling treatment it is getting by the Labour administration is going to kill it off once and for all.  I use the Market Barber in the covered market and works to that unit seem to have been going on for ages too.  I hear of stories of bodged roof repairs meaning units get flooded when it rains and there is a leak into the cellar and someone's storage space that the City Council should have addressed months ago.

There's an article about this in the Oxford Mail today about this and I have to say I am disgusted by the remarks Labour's Colin Cook makes about some of the long serving and hard working traders.  He says,

“This situation is not just down to high rents. It’s partly as a result of the age of some traders, who are looking to retire and cash in their chips.

“When rents are assessed for market traders we look at close comparators on the high street.”

I don't know about you but I think that is pretty outrageous, not to mention ageist and totally lacking in gratitude for the wonderful service to our City and tourist attraction the Market represents.  I do rather agree with the Oxford Mail editorial comment about this.  "while the council has a duty to maximise its income from its asset, it has to be big enough to realise that and make the necessary adjustments to make this an attractive business opportunity."

My colleague Cllr Jim Campbell put the rent issue rather well in a letter to the Oxford Mail earlier this year.  He says "Although the rate of inflation over the past five years is less than 18 per cent, they have proposed rent increases of between 40 and 60 per cent."

I think it is an utter disgrace that Oxford Labour claims to be the champion of fighting bad landlords and at the same time has so badly neglected the Covered Market and is pushing such clearly ridiculous and unsustainable rent rises.

Labour:  You are killing the HMO sector already with onerous costs on landlords - please don't now kill the Covered Market by pricing the tenants out of the retail units.

A note on the system of political parties

I've been asked to comment about why I think the party system is a good thing for the electorate. This is an extract from a sermon I preached at Mansfield College back in 2002 entitled "Politics and Faith – Complementary or Mutually exclusive".  The URC is the United Reformed Church - the denomination in which I am a member, elder and lay preacher.

"I should explain a little about political parties and how they fit into government both local and national.  The dictionary definition of the word political is "affecting the state or government, engaged in civil administration, having an organised form of society or government".  The political parties exist as groups of people who have similar political views.  People form these groups so that they might work together to govern in the way that best fits their collective view.  Just as in the URC nobody is expected to agree 100% with everything their party stands for however most will agree with a large proportion of their own party's policy.  Sometimes a particular issue will cause great problems in a party and this can be the most interesting but most testing time of one’s own integrity.  Compare the issue of Europe and the single currency for some political parties to the issue of human sexuality for the URC.  The similarities are striking.  What makes politics so interesting (and frustrating sometimes) to me is trying to work out how closely (or not!) our principles match those of fellow party members and how we might come to a compromise agreeable to all.  Indeed the sort of meeting as a councillor that I find the most difficult but yet the most interesting are the regular meetings of my own political party's group – for my sins I am its chair this year.

You could say that in an ideal world, all councillors would be independent of political parties and that they would all truly represent those that elected them.  I have nothing at all against independent politicians, indeed being independent and having one's own mind is crucial to being a good politician.  The problem is that if you had 48 people in the council chamber with 48 different views and agenda you'd never decide anything and never get anything done.  It is also difficult, if not impossible, to get elected without the support of a larger body such as a political party in campaigning and in being effective as a councillor.  Most parties will provide support not only in getting elected in the first place but also in how to be an effective councillor, and how to balance working life with being a councillor and perhaps having family responsibilities.  The political parties help to ensure that government is effective but still accountable to the electorate and also help the electorate to know a little about what values and principles a candidate has.  With the best will in the world, no candidate can possibly know all 4000 or so electors in a ward!"

Thames Valley Police: "Have your say" meetings

I've just received notification of some further "Have your say" meetings that our local police are organising. I can recommend you attend one of these if you have a few minutes. They are at:

Date: Saturday, 27 October 2012
Time: 12:00 - 15:00
Venue: Ice rink, Oxpens Road

Date: Saturday, 17 November 2012
Time: 12:00 - 15:00
Venue: Ice rink, Oxpens Road

Date: Saturday, 08 December 2012
Time: 12:00 - 15:00
Venue: Ice rink, Oxpens Road

Oxford University Liberal Democrats resurgent!

( a guest post by Layla Morgan)

Last week marked the end of the Freshers Fair at Oxford University. Held in the Examination School on the High Street, this three day event marked a resurgence for the OULD as hundreds of students signed up to receive emails and join the oldest political society in Oxford.

The brightly coloured stall, adorned with a brand new banner attracted a steady stream of students asking for more information or to ask about their latest campaigns. Beers mats with 'I Love Me' were given away to promote the Body Confidence Campaign started by Jo Swinson MP, now a minister for Equality. The Bears for Belarus campaign which fights for greater Democracy in Belarus also received a lot of attention. OULD are also firmly behind the OU for Obama campaign and will be supporting Obama's re-election into November. With strong links already between the Liberal Democrats and the Democrats in the USA, this is a natural extension to a flourishing partnership between the parties.

This is the first year that Lib Dem HQ has employed a full time Liberal Youth officer, Katherine Pugh (katherine.Pugh@libdems.org.uk) who was able to send out subsidised freshers packs across the country. She was been working hard to connect the Liberal Youth wing of the party (see www.liberalyouth.org for more info) to local parties and central campaigns to enhance our campaigning capabilities for the 2013 local elections.

Co-Chair of OULD Rio Jones commented,  "I am really pleased to see so many people sign up this year. It is the best it has been since entering coalition. We plan to add an extra dimension to the club this year by doing more campaigning and offering training for our members. It is going to be a great year"

If you would like more information about the OULD, contact Rio or his counterpart Mairi Robertson. You can visit their facebook page or email them at co-chairs@oxfordlibdems.org.uk.

Stop Press: Mill Street planning appeal dismissed!

I am delighted to report that I received an email today letting me know that the appeal against the refusal of the 3-storey accommodation block very close to Mill Street and Abbey Walk has been dismissed.  That means there is no planning permission in place so the scheme can't currently be built.

This is great news for me, having represented the council and the residents at the appeal, and great news for residents who objected.

A weekend test-drive of an i-MiEV electric car

I was asked by a friend, Barrie, to test drive a Mitsubishi i-MiEV for the weekend sometime and I had a few trips to make this weekend I agreed to give it a go. It came from Humphris on Rose Hill where he works - apparently they wanted the view of a councillor!  I picked the car up on Saturday morning and was quite pleasantly surprised at how similar to any other small automatic it was in driving style and appearance. You even have a key to put in the "ignition" to turn it on and "start" the electric motor.

Once home I had a good look around the car inside and out. As it has no internal combustion engine it has electric power steering and there is a dedicated electric vacuum pump to provide the brake servo assistance. The brakes feel very normal, just like on any car of that size. Under the bonnet there is a 12v battery just like in a petrol or diesel car - it's used for lights, wipers internal fans, indicators and so on. It also controls the electrics that manage the main traction motor and the big traction battery. The traction battery is huge and sits at the rear of the car under the back seat. It produces around 300v DC which is converted to 3-phase AC current to drive the traction motor. For those interested it produces about 66PS which is about the same a 1.1 litre small petrol car. The torque curve is very different though, with the electric motor having good torque right from a standstill, unlike a petrol engine which won't do much at all below 1000rpm. The flexibility of the electric motor means that the car only has one gear as the motor can cope right through the speed range and reverse is just achieved by running the motor backwards. There is no clutch either as a motor doesn't need it.  There is no spare wheel but instead a tyre repair kit and a small compressor for re-inflation.  A tiny gripe with the interior is that there is no clock so you can't see what time it is very easily.

The first journey was a little drive up to the ring road then back down Brasenose Driftway and Crescent Road to see how it coped with the downhill run. As well as "Drive" mode the car also has "Braking" and "Comfort" modes - they are really just variations on a theme. Regenerative braking is used in all modes, an average amount in D, more in B and less in C. The car slows down quite rapidly to about 10mph in B mode with your foot off the accelerator, giving the battery a little charge while it's doing it.

I got braver then and went with some friends up to Watlington Hill for a walk. We took the A40 and the M40 up to the Lewknor turn and while the car felt perfectly safe and stable at 70mph on the M40 (top speed is rated at around 80mph) it was eating the charge in the battery at an alarming rate so we slowed to 60mph. The car is definitely happier at City Speeds.  Up to about 50mph it is pretty efficient. There is a power gauge on the dashboard and the trick is to keep the needle in the "eco" area as the economy is far better then.

Later on Saturday we did the supermarket run in the i-MiEV. Again fine but the boot is rather little - we filled it with what I'd call a smaller than average weekly shop.

On Sunday I drove into Oxford and then out to Cumnor to lead worship at the United Reformed Church there. The car ran beautifully.  For lunch I took Gordon to the Bat and Ball at Cuddesdon then in the early evening I visited Wolvercote to babysit my nephew Oliver for a few hours.  I was glad of the small size of the i-MiEV in Wolvercote as my sister and her family live on a small side road with extremely tight parking!



Charging the car is achieved with a mains cable that is 5 metres long so quite easy to use if you have a driveway.  It takes 7 hours in total to charge the car from flat and does so at a rate of 3kW so uses about 21kWh of electricity to do it.  At today's prices that costs about £2.50 - £3.  A full charge claims to do 90 miles and I reckon I'll get pretty close to that if I stay off motorways.  In comparison, an efficient similarly-sized petrol car would probably use about 9 litres of petrol to do that, costing £12.60 at today's £1.40/litre fuel price.  That's quite a significant difference!  For someone with a daily commute up to about 20 or 30 miles away it would save a fortune in petrol or diesel costs!  You can also get a fast charge cable to use in dedicated charging points - this charges at 50kW and takes about half an hour to get the battery to 80%.

All in all I am impressed with the i-MiEV.  I could easily cope with it as my main car as almost all journeys I make are shorter than 20 miles and it's rare to need to go over 50mph in and around Oxford.  For the odd weekend away and the summer camping trip it would not be outrageous to hire a car as that can be done pretty cheaply and conveniently these days.  As electric plug-in cars get cheaper and their range gets longer it may well become a serious proposition for the masses in a few years' time. It makes particular sense if, like us, you have a Solar PV installation so you can charge the vehicle with electricity you've generated yourself.  At the moment the prices are too high and battery life (i.e. number of charges) is still uncertain but I'm sure this will all change in time.

I must say I was surprised at how drivable and comfortable the i-MiEV is.  It feels very much like a small auto with continuously variable transmission and I got used to it very quickly.  It will never win any speed trials but around town it's perfect - it has good acceleration from a standstill and has the great advantage over a petrol or diesel car that when it is stationary, even just in traffic, it is using no energy at all.  It emits zero Carbon Dioxide (although of course the electricity has to be generated somewhere and that might produce CO2) and is virtually silent in running. Its small size, with very little outside the visible area at the front or back makes it an absolute breeze to park.

I shall be sorry to return it on Monday morning!

Annual mayor-making

Alan Armitage became the 52nd Lord Mayor of Oxford today.  It was the the normal line-up of speeches and appointments.  I had to leave a bit early to get to a meeting at the school where I am a governor.

Cllr Abbasi was appointed deputy Lord Mayor and Cllr Sinclair the Sheriff of Oxford.

A full slate!

I am delighted to be able to report that Oxford Lib Dems have once again nominated a full slate of candidates for all 24 wards of our City for the upcoming local elections in May.

There are some really excellent candidates there - new enthusiastic people who are a real credit to their communities, current serving councillors and several who are hoping to return to serving as City Councillors after a break.

I hope you'll enjoy reading about them - you can find them all at:

http://youroxford.org or
http://oxfordlibdems.org.uk/elections-2012

Amazing work from City Works again!

Some of you will be aware that I worship at St. Columba's United Reformed Church on Sundays. This morning, those that arrived a bit early (around 10am) found most of the recycling bins (that I think belong to All Bar One) emptied all over Alfred Street so there was masses of rubbish and broken glass everywhere. Too much certainly to drive over. This was a big problem as we were due a visit from the Churches together in Central Oxford ecumenical donkey at 10.45am.  What you see in the picture is almost the end of the clean-up.  It was FAR worse than that.

One of our elders phones City Works and I was hugely impressed at how quickly they got there and what a great job they did of clearing up.  These guys really are  a credit to our City.  Thank you!

I do wonder why it is places like All Bar One are allowed to leave so many recycling containers all over the street on Saturday night into Sunday though.  They are incredibly ugly and I don't think commercial collections happen on Sundays anyway.

Three licensing hearings

There were three hearings today: A variation for Thirst Lodge on Park End Street, a new license for The Oxford Kebab House on Manzil Way and a license review for the Hi-Lo Jamaican Eating House on Cowley Road.

I couldn't hear the first as the Council has a policy that ward councillors cannot decide licensing applications in their own wards. I am not alone in thinking this is silly as we are perfectly allowed to make planning decisions (which are much more final if they are approvals) and we have good training and strict rules about declaring conflicts of interest in any case.

The first hearing was basically an application for an extra half hour of opening at Thirst Lodge. Everyone acknowledged that this is a well-run venue but Thames Valley Police were objecting on the basis of the City Centre Special Saturation Policy (SSP). I have to say I think the Police were right to object. The decision was to grant the variation and personally I think that was the wrong decision as it undermines the validity of the  SSP. While Thirst is very well run so probably won't be a problem with an extra half hour, I'd not like to commit to that position for all venues in the City Centre SSP area.

The second hearing was the license review for the Hi-Lo Jamaican eating house.  This was quite difficult as there was clearly some misunderstanding on the part of the license holder about what was permitted and what was not, as well as when it was permitted.  Part of the problem is that this was a license "grandfathered" from the pre-2003 Act licensing arrangements so some of the terminology in it was obsolete.  We had a good discussion with the licensee and with City Council Environmental Protection (EP) and eventually decided that a short suspension of the ability to play licensable live or recorded music was in order.  We were told that lots of measures had been put in place to mitigate the problems that had been the basis of lots of complaints (with lots of evidence from Environmental Protection Officers) but as the problems had been severe and ongoing we felt it necessary for another visit from EP to happen so this could be officially checked.  If all was in order we were happy then for the licensing team to re-instate the licensable music on the premises license.  We also clarified that after the terminal hour for licensable music then background (non-licensable) music should be just that - barely audible in the premises itself, let alone in adjoining premises or outside.  I hope that things will be resolved soon and that the license can be re-instated once EP is happy that the premises can operate without damaging the rights of it neighbours to quiet enjoyment of their own premises.  It should be noted that we did nothing to the hours during which the venue is allowed to serve food or alcohol as neither of these had been the cause of any complaints.

The final hearing was by the Oxford Kebab House which is on Manzil Way in the medical centre.  The application was for live and recorded music and again, I think there was some confusion about what type and level of music actually required a license.  The applicant explained that the lice music would be acoustic, Persian music played in the upstairs restaurant area up to only around 11pm.  There were concerns from some residents about noise in and around the venue but we felt that these could be managed as the premises operator is experienced in such things and has a good record.  We encouraged all neighbours to keep in touch and reminded all that the license could be reviewed if it transpired there were problems at an unacceptable level.

As always, please note that this post does not form an official record of proceedings and should not be treated as such. The decision notice from the City Council is always the definitive document.

An unexpected dinner at Exeter College and a great presentation by the Chief Constable

I was invited at short notice to dinner at Exeter College today by a friend.  I had the great pleasure of sitting next to the Rector, Dr Frances Cairncross and we had a good discussion about Labour's housing policies in the City including the apparent contradiction of making development difficult by insisting on huge financial contributions to other housing and the push to get more and more students out of family housing so it can be released to the rest of the market.

The dinner was extremely enjoyable and it was good to talk a bit about local politics (at their instigation) with some academic members of Exeter's staff.  One College member was celebrating her fifth birthday as she had been born on February 29th, 20 years ago.  Actually I'd say it was her fourth as there was no leap year in 2000!

After the meal we were treated to an excellent presentation by the Thames Valley Police Chief Constable, Sara Thornton CBE QPM.  Sara had been the guest of The Rector of the College and was giving a talk to some students studying criminology.  The title of the talk was "Does it Matter if there are Fewer Police Officers in the Future?".  I was hugely impressed at Sara's strong sense of justice both for victim as well as the accused.  I thought her insights into what makes good Policing and how communities work were really fascinating and resonated very much with my thinking about Policing being about helping people to get it right as well as just catching and criminalising them when they get it wrong.  Sara also had great insight into targeting Policing where it will have the best effect.

Oxford University Living Wage event

I attended this event today at the invitation of the Oxford University Living Wage Campaign.  I must admit Living Wage is not really something I'd thought about before but the speeches from the panel I heard this evening were incredibly compelling.  There are aspects of the living wage that I'm slightly ashamed to say I had never really considered before.  The session felt a little bit like diversity training in that it completely moved me on from seeing a living wage as a burden on an employer to seeing it as a positive advantage, just as is paying proper attention to diversity by doing all you can to include as many people as possible.  It never really occurred to me that paying more money to poorer people is actually much better for the economy than paying it to richer people as the former will spend it locally whereas the latter may well squirrel it away in offshore tax avoidance schemes where it does nothing to benefit our economy .  There are the obvious morale, attendance, commitment and retention advantages of a living wage also.  If nothing else then to me paying a Living Wage is simply a matter of common decency and justice that all should be able to expect.

The event was held in the Exam Schools of Oxford University, and that's quite ambitious as the rooms are not small.  The panel was of the highest quality and the event was extremely well-attended with over a hundred people there.  This just showed me how important people see this issue to be, particularly in the light of housing and the cost of living being so expensive in Oxford.  A member of Oxford City Council, Van Coulter, made an excellent speech about the need for a living wage and reminded us that Oxford has one of the highest cost of living to average income ratios in the whole country.  He said it's like paying London prices on a West Midlands wage and I think he's right!  Van also made the excellent point that if people are forced to live on very low wages then they make compromises like buying cheap, unhealthy food, that ultimately shorten their lifespans and of course make them less efficient employees.

It's also great to hear about all the excellent work the Living Wage Campaign has been doing with Oxford University and its Colleges.  Some Colleges have already adopted a living wage and apparently discussions with the University are going well.  This pleases me as an employee of the University, although I must say not one who has any issue whatsoever with his own wages!  There were quite a few College bursars present as well as some college employees on lower wages and apparently some useful discussions were had after the main speaker event.

If you are interested in learning more about the Living Wage campaign the I recommend following @oxlivingwage on Twitter, emailing livingwage@ousu.org or if you want to focus on these issues during Lent 2012 from a Christian perspective then the Call to Change website gives more information about the Living Wage in the wider UK.

All said a first-class student-organised event about a massively important issue for Oxford that certainly got me thinking to an extent that not many things do!  What a far cry from the image students some East Oxford people seem to have that says they are "increasing to unbearable amounts already in this area and they do not need any further encouragement or welcoming into our community because they bring nothing positive" (See my previous blog post on this).

Neighbourhood Forum: Student housing and the Vision for the City Centre

This was a rather informal meeting but useful nonetheless.  It was good to see quite a few students present as well as someone from Oxford University's Accommodation office, a member of staff from Christ Church and Gordon Reid from City Centre management.

We had a good discussion about student hopes for the City Centre and the Wayfinding project that has been going on.  The signs have been tendered for and there is now a project to provide QR codes for them to give people more contextual information.  I reminded people that the excellent Mobile Oxford service from Oxford University also provides a lot of this information and that the Wayfinding project really ought to work in partnership with it.  QR codes are fine but there is so much more that mobile Oxford can do!

We then moved onto the issue of student housing.  We had a presentation about the HMO licensing scheme which was interesting and while there are many good things about it I do have concerns that it will have a drastic effect on an already short supply of essential housing for students and many other people in Oxford.  For example we heard how the council is using web sites that advertise house shares to track down and penalise landlords.  Wouldn't it be so much better to use council resources putting adverts on those websites to educate tenants and prospective tenants about the need to check for a license.  Wouldn't it be so much more positive to spend effort helping tenants get appropriate housing than assuming landlords are somehow bad and evil?

I've posted a lot about this so won't go on about it here but I do hope that the Council will sometime soon accept that Landlords are generally good people who are genuinely trying to do the right thing, and thus focus on education and support rather than pursuit and penalisation.

Licensing and Gambling Acts Committee

We met today as part of the regular meeting cycle.  We had a useful and impressive update on licensing activities from Julian Alison, our licensing manager and it was good to have a presentation from Inspector Katy Barrow-Grint of Thames Valley Police.  Katy is the new City Centre and North Oxford inspector and I was impressed at her commitment to partnership working with the City Council as the licensing authority.  I had raised an issue with her by email this morning and she had researched it thoroughly and had an excellent answer ready for the meeting.  I was grateful for that.

Another items on the agenda was the relaxation of licensing hours for the Queen's Diamond Jubilee in July this year. It means that on Fri 1st Jun and Sat 2nd Jun premises that are already licensed will be able to carry on those licensable activities until 1am the next morning if they currently have an earlier termination of licensable activities.

We also looked at some proposals to address some of the problems of late-night drinking.  The Government is currently consulting on a Late Night Levy (on clubs etc. to fund more policing) and Early Morning Restriction Orders (EMROs) that local authorities can use to to restrict the sale of alcohol in the whole or a part of their areas between 3am and 6am on all or some days, to address specific problems caused by the late night supply of alcohol in their areas.

The meeting took about an hour.

Central South and West Area Forum: Community-led planning

This meeting was held at St. Barnabas School in Jericho as we rotate around the area.

The main focus of the meeting was a discussion on community-led planning, both in terms of community work and planning in the development control sense.

The Head of City Planning attended and gave a useful overview of the Localism Bill and its provisions for Neighbourhood Plans.  We were referred to a short overview document (PDF) about Neighbourhood Plans too.

A good discussion ensued and I think some of the salient points are:

1. The localism bill seems to be more aimed at rural communities to allow them to plan for and authorise more development so it's not clear how useful it would be in a crowded urban area like Oxford.

2.  Councillors are very tightly bound by planning law and when we are determining applications it does feel more like we are serving those laws than serving the desires of our electorates.  If we refuse things when there is no planning reason we are likely to get the decision overturned by an unelected planning inspector and may get costs awarded against us as a local authority.  That has to be paid out of Oxford taxpayers' money so serves nobody.

I shall keep a close eye on how the Localism Bill develops.

Although the meeting was in Jericho it was a shame very few people from Jericho attended.  I do also question how sensible it is having a meeting in a cold primary school hall, where the chairs are more suitable for 5-11 year olds than adults!

Full Council: 2012-13 Budget and Council tax

This was a long meeting but a pleasantly constructive one.   It's the annual meeting where the budget is proposed by the administration and then the other party groups propose amendments which inevitably fall because the administration has a majority.  But we have to go through the process as it is a good chance for political groups to show their priorities for the City, especially in the run-up to local elections.

As we LibDems are not really a million miles from the Oxford City Administration on lots of issues we take the view that it's better to propose a small-ish number of sensible and properly costed amendments to the administration budget rather than wasting lots of officer time preparing a budget that we know won't get voted through anyway.  I'm pleased to say that our budget amendments were confirmed by the senior financial officer (the Section 151 Officer) as being financially workable and thus legal.   This was not the case for the symbolic mess that the Green Party proposed!  (Yes that is a political comment but this is a political blog!).

Our budget amendments were presented expertly by Cllr Mark Mills, our Deputy Leader, and the headline additions were:  Re-introduce democratic area assemblies; restore a full out-of-hours noise complaint service; 24 hour help service for all tenants (not just those in social housing); double the number of apprenticeships offered by the council; free parking for electric vehicles; and retaining the current Dial a Ride service.  There was more.  These extra costs would be offset by cutting councillor allowances; cut war councillor budgets; and delete proactive river bank work.  The budget was well-received by all present, including some clapping from the public gallery.  The Administration response was gracious and I appreciated that greatly.

There was time for the normal questions to councillors so I made sure I asked some more about the HMO licensing scheme:

My first was about a home with a couple "living together as if spouses or civil partners" and one other person.  The answer seems to imply discrimination against people based on martial status, which I thought was illegal!

My second question was clarifying if where a house, if classified as an HMO because it has 3 or more lodgers with resident landlords, needs to count the landlord(s) in the numbers in the HMO - the answer was yes.  This of course means even more expense for people just letting rooms in their houses to help make ends meet and to provide hugely needed accommodation for many people in our City.

My third was really just an observation that the council lets its own tenants (often vulnerable families with children) live in much worse conditions than it is now allowing private lets of non-vulnerable adults to live in.   The answer seemed vague but I think it was basically because the council has the power with HMOs but not with families - frankly I think that's rubbish as the Administration could do all sorts of improvements to its own housing that it lets to tenants if it chose to.

My final question pointed out the obvious paradox in the City Council at the moment whereby it pays landlords a £600 finders fee plus expenses for landlords with a two-bed house to let but that for a three-bed there are onerous HMO checks and fees of £362 plus £150 per year to pay.  The answer was that there is a shortage of two-bed properties in Oxford.  If the Administration thinks the current HMO scheme is going to do anything at all to improve that situation then frankly I think its members are bonkers!

The pocket park on Middle Fisher Row

I visited this area today on the request of the owner and operator of The Oxford Retreat as he is concerned about antisocial behaviour, drug use and damage to the rear fence of his venue.  I was pleased to have a Street Scene team leader with me to give advice on what might be possible.

The problem is that this little pocket of land, just behind Middle Fisher Row (between Park End Street and Hythe Bridge Street) is very badly lit an so tends to attract all sort of antisocial behaviour.  Drugs paraphernalia, broken glass and all sorts of other rubbish are found there by the street scene team most days.  The area also attracts people urinating or worse in the small hours of the morning as it is so much part of the light night entertainment area of the City.

You can see the damage to the rear fence of the Oxford Retreat in the picture - the apparently happens regularly.  There have been break-ins too.

I think there are lots of angles on this problem - lighting must help so I'll investigate that and it may be that a better fence needs to be erected to protect the fence that is the property of the Oxford Retreat.  I don't want to see the area fenced off but it might make sense to allow some community or commercial use of the area so it's bit less likely to attract problems.  Watch this space!  The first job will be to work out who owns the land.

City Council Management Practice Group

I was invited to this event by the City Council's Head of Law and Governance. He invited several councillors to give perspectives on what our specific roles require from the organisation in order to function optimally. The capacity in which I was invited was as a regulatory chair. I am Chair of Planning Review Committee and vice chair of the Licensing and Gambling Acts 2003 Committee so spoke about both those functions.  Other Councillors speaking were Stephen Brown (Scrutiny Chair), Val Smith (Executive Member), Dick Wolff (New Member).

My 5 minute talk was basically just a run through of all the things City Council Officers do that work well for me in my role.  I'm pleased to be in the position of not really wanting so much else as our Officers already do such a good job.

I said I would write a blog post with my main points so here they are:

1.  Councillors and officers work together but need to remember that we have different roles.  Officers are there to represent the council whereas councillors are there to represent the electorate, including those in their wards who didn't vote or didn't vote for them.  The quasi-judicial nature of regulatory work can be difficult in this context but is not impossible.  Members of the public often believe that councillors have more discretion in licensing and planning matters than we actually do and this expectation needs to be carefully and honestly managed.

2.  Councillors depend on reports from Officers, as professionals in their fields, so we have the right information on which to base our decision.  Reports are most useful when they are concise and balanced.  I think they should present arguments on each side of a decision, weigh them up and them make a recommendation.  They should indicate how strong the case is in the recommended direction and indicate any conditions that might be appropriate to impose to mitigate any negative effects of a decision in either direction.  Reports are for the purpose of informing members, not convincing them, although they will of course have considerable influence on members' decisions.

3. Site visits are extremely useful.  Planning decisions are much better made if Councillors have seen the local context for themselves and I've found it extremely useful when Officers have arranged access to the homes of local residents so we can get a first-hand appreciation of the issues.  Facilitated meetings both with applicants and objectors are also extremely useful and I'm grateful to Council Officers for providing these.  All that Officers can do and provide to help Councillors better understand the context within which they are making regulatory decisions is much appreciated.

4. Councillors are real people so have lives that are tied up in many aspects of Oxford's life as a City.  This can sometimes lead to conflicts of interest when making regulatory decisions.  Oxford has first-rate officers in its legal department and they have always provided excellent legal advice on what Councillors might need to consider when deciding whether or not they have a conflict of interest.  I am clear that it is the Councillors' job to decide if there is a conflict of interest, not the Officers', but also very grateful for the good legal advice that we receive on this.  It's also useful when Officers raise matters with us that we might not have considered - an example of this for me was a few night's board and lodging from a German Councillor in Bonn as part of the town twinning trip last year.  I hadn't considered for one minute that he might make a planning or licensing application in Oxford at some point!

5.  Planning meetings are often contentious as the decisions that are made have direct impact on people's lives and buildings are often in place for 100 years or more.  I like to make sure everyone at the meeting, including the public, is welcomed and knows who everybody around the table is and why they are there.  It's great that we have well-presented Officer reports that use modern technology to make things as clear as possible.  I also find it useful to clarify to everyone present that Officers are professionals and experts in their work whereas councillors are democratically elected amateurs who have the job of making the decision.  Sometimes people can start being nasty to officers if they are making a recommendation that is against what they want and I think it's useful as chair to remind such people that Officers as simply doing their job and giving their professional opinion.  They are not controlling councillors or making the decision so if anyone needs abusing (and actually nobody ever does!) then it should be Councillors, not officers.  I also made the point that if there are difficult issues in a planning application that are related to things that other authorities are responsible for then it's really useful to have those professionals along to the meeting- these can sometimes be from the highways agency or the highway authority (County Council).

6. Licensing hearings are a bit different to planning meetings in that licensing decisions are more reversible as they don't often result in buildings being erected!  I like to run licensing hearings in a conciliatory and constructive way.  While the process inevitably has a winner and a loser I think it's hugely helpful to run it as a conversation and make sure all parties feel they have had their say and been properly listened to.  I am extremely grateful to licensing officers for enabling hearings to happen like this.  Good legal advice is also essential to good licensing decisions and I'm pleased to say we enjoy that both during hearings and during the time when the licensing panel is in private to deliberate and make its decision.

7.  Council officers are hugely important in making sure that everything presented to committees and licensing hearings is properly evidence-based and has a firm audit trail behind it.  So-called evidence that is circumstantial, hearsay or conjecture about what might or might not happen if a particular decision is taken or not taken really is not helpful.  Such pseudo-evidence just confuses the decision and inappropriately raises the expectations of the interested parties about what outcomes might be possible.  We are very fortunate in Oxford to have Officers who are extremely pro-active in ensuring that responsible authorities and interested parties only bring substantial evidence that will stand up properly.

8.  Sometimes Councillors will make a decision that is against Officer advice.  That's right and proper and the way the democratic process works.  Such decisions though will often be the subject of appeals, which if allowed can cost the Council (and hence the taxpayer) a lot of money in legal fees.  it is thus vital that Councillors receive appropriate Officer support when formulating decision notices that are not what Officers advice.  I appreciate that this can be difficult of Officers as Councillors are effectively asking them to justify the position that is opposite to their own.  I am nonetheless impressed that planning and licensing officers are able to do this, in full respect of the democratic process and democratic right of Councillors to disagree with them.  Again, its a piece of Officer support for which I am extremely grateful.

9. Finally, council meetings and hearings would be pointless if they were not clerked and minuted accurately and efficiently.  Oxford has a great Legal and Democratic Services Team and I particularly appreciate the way minutes are always on time, always run past me as chair for checking (and perhaps minor changes) and published promptly.  It's also good to know that some Council Officers read this blog to make sure I'm not saying anything that might bring it into disrepute or cause difficulties that I had not anticipated.

There was not time for any questions but I was pleased to be invited to join the Council's managers for lunch and I had some more interesting discussions with several  I had not met before or did not know other than by email.

A good couple of hours!

Oxford Pride Residents and Neighbours information meeting

I was really pleased to be invited to this event today by the Oxford Pride Organising Committee, mainly because as the ward councillor it's important that I know what's going on in the area so I can make sure residents and neighbours are kept in the loop.  The secondary reason is that I was one of the main organisers of the first ever Oxford Pride back in 2003.  This year is the 10th Oxford Pride and I can't believe how quickly the time has passed.

[caption id="attachment_563" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Viewing the draft plans with Simon House project workers"][/caption]

All neighbours had been leafleted a few weeks ago by the Pride Chair so we were expecting a few to turn up.  Not many did but that might be something to do with the snow that's in Oxford at the moment.  It was great, however that two of the project workers from A2 Dominion's supported housing at Simon House came and spoke to us - they were incredibly supportive of Pride and very happy that it is happening this year in their immediate neighbourhood, Paradise Street and Paradise Square.  We talked about plans for the day and I was impressed at how well Mazz Image (Oxford Pride Festival and Event Coordinator) explained everything and how well organised Pride seems to be.  It's a far cry from those early efforts in 2003!

I hope Oxford Pride this year is a huge success and I'm looking forward to what will be a great day.  It's on 16th June and I'm touched that I've been asked to get as many of the original 2003 organisers together as possible to go at the front of the parade.  What fun!

Partnerships Training

This session was set up for councillors by two officers from Strategic Policy and Partnerships.

I found it useful to have an overview of how the City Council works in partnership with other bodies both at the City and the County level and there was some useful information about changes to partnerships since the change of government in May 2010.  In particular we noted:

•Scrapping of the Local Area Agreement
•Scrapping of the National Indicators
•Removal of statutory duty to develop a Sustainable Community Strategy (and therefore the need for Local Strategic Partnerships)
•Scrapping of regional bodies (SEEDA, GOSE)
•Introduction of Local Enterprise Partnerships
•Changes to the Health and Well Being Board linked to the NHS reforms

The Oxford Strategic Partnership has some new priorities, structure and subgroups also:

You can click the image to get an even bigger version.

I had no idea there were so many bodies involved in the Oxford Strategic Partnership.  They include:  Oxford City Council; Oxfordshire County Council; NHS Oxfordshire; Oxfordshire Community and Voluntary Action; Oxford University; Oxford Brookes University; Oxford and Cherwell Valley College; Thames Valley Police; Oxford Inspires; Critchleys; and Oxford Preservation Trust.

The one suggestion I made was that meetings of all the partnerships, which are public and published should be added to the Council's meetings newsfeed to get the importance of partnership working higher up on the agenda.

Really impressive work from City Council Officers!

If you read this blog lots you'll know that I volunteer as a Street Pastor in Oxford.  Well I was out last Friday evening and had drawn to my attention a dangerous situation in that the railings that are between the river and the side of the steps up from Fisher Row to Hythe Bridge Street don't actually meet the brickwork of the bridge itself.  The photo shows what I mean.  It is taken looking East towards Worcester Street and George Street from just outside the Oxford Retreat.   You can see the gap is big enough for a person to fall through and that apparently had happened to a rather intoxicated young lady earlier in the month.  One of the door supervisors at the Oxford Retreat told me the story of how he had jumped into the river to save the young woman.

I said I would include the dangerous situation in my report of the night.  The report goes to the Street Pastors Coordinator for Oxford and to the Violent Crime & CCTV Manager for the City Council, Karen Crossan.  Karen reported the issue immediately to the relevant people in City Works and I also sent them a request today.  I am incredibly impressed that they took mine and Karen's requests extremely seriously and dealt with them so fast.  The result is that "the handrail will now be extended, a stainless steel section will be welded into place tomorrow morning at 0530".

Fantastic work chaps - huge thanks to Dave Huddle for making this happen in little more than 12 hours from my request!

Licensing Hearing: The new Sainsbury's in Summertown

I chaired this panel hearing today that was necessary because two Summertown residents had sent in a joint letter of objection to the premises licence application. I was joined by Cllrs Mary Clarkson and Mark Lygo.

The application was from Sainsbury's as they are opening a new convenience store in Summertown in March.  They were applying for a license to sell alcohol on an off-sales basis only from 7am-11pm 7 days per week in line with the opening hours of the store itself.  It should be noted that we were simply deciding on the alcohol licence - all the other necessary permissions for the store to operate were already in place.

The objections centred around the risk that children might buy alcohol and the possible need for a security guard.  I put these to the applicants and got a very detailed description of Sainsbury's ways of working, including their think 25 policy, and how in Leeds they have a similar store where problems have been avoided by close working with the Police and the local Community.  Sainsbury's probably would employ a security guard at "sensitive" times but did not want to accept this as a condition.  I must say I was a bit perturbed that the objectors seemed rather to be objecting to a Sainsbury's store rather than the sale of alcohol and indeed that's what their petition said.

After the applicants and objectors had summed up they were dismissed while we made our decision.  We took the view that Sainsbury's had addressed all the concerns so granted the hours as applied for but with a condition that a prominent sign reminding customers that Summertown was an alcohol-free zone must be displayed by all exits.  We also asked for contact details of the manager to be displayed for residents to use in case of problems and reminded Sainsbury's that if there were problems it was open to the responsible authorities and the interested parties to call a licence review in the future.

I felt it was useful for Sainsbury's to be able to hear to concerns of residents and I hope the hearing will be the start of an ongoing dialogue that will enable Sainsbury's and the residents of Summertown to co-exist in common understanding and peace!

Please note this post does not form an official record of proceedings and should not be treated as such.  The decision notice from the City Council is the definitive document.

The remainder of December's full council

This was the rest of the meeting from December 19th. To be honest very little of note happened. There were lots of questions from councillors to other councillors as well as quite a few motions. With majority control of a council I'm afraid the outcomes of these are generally pretty predictable!

The one thing of note that we did was to vote on the 2012-13 council year civic post holders.  I am delighted to say that Cllr Alan Armitage will be the next Lord Mayor of Oxford but rather less delighted that the council has chosen to make an HMO Landlord who was recently bound over for the state of one of his Oxford HMOs into next year's Deputy Lord Mayor.  Cllr Dee Sinclair will be Sheriff.

I did finally get to ask my questions about HMOs but the portfolio holder wasn't present so the leader of the council answered them in his absence. I wasn't impressed! Here they are, and the answers, with my supplementary comments/questions:

Q1: Given that this council's "HMO Amenity and Facilities Good Practice Guidelines" make it clear that one shared bathroom which includes a lavatory is sufficient for up to four people in an HMO can Cllr McManners tell me why, with just two more people a second bathroom (also containing a lavatory) is not deemed sufficient by the administration? Can he tell me how many extra lavatories in the last 12 months this council has forced landlords to have installed in 6-person HMOs that already had two lavatory-containing shared bathrooms?

Response: There are no national standards for facilities and amenities in HMOs and each council must produce its own guidelines. Our standards were developed following consultation with landlords in the city as well as consideration of work carried out by other local authorities. Some of the proposed standards were amended following comments from landlords. We recently compared our standards with those used by 14 other similar cities and concluded that the standards being applied in Oxford are consistent with those being applied elsewhere. The use of an HMO is considered to be very different to a family house occupied by a similar number of people which is why additional standards are required. For example, 6 young professionals living in a house are all likely to be getting ready to go to work at the same time in the morning and so both bathrooms are likely to be in constant use. A separate w.c. is therefore an essential amenity for the other occupiers....

There were only two HMOs licensed in the last 12 months where an additional separate toilet was required to be installed. Both of these properties were occupied by 6 people and had 2 bathrooms.

As far as I'm concerned that still doesn't answer my question.  Why is 1 OK for four if 2 are not OK for 6?  It makes no sense to me.  At least the problem is not as widespread as I'd thought.

Q2: In the last 12 months, how many Oxford homes where an HMO license has been applied (or re-applied) for have passed the inspection without the Council requiring modifications, or additions before the grant of the license? What percentage of total homes inspected in that period does that figure represent?

Response: The records indicate that in the last 12 months only 11 HMOs were inspected that did not require any work before the licence was granted. A total of 454 inspections have been carried out so this represents 2% of the total for the same period.

The answer then goes on in depth about how many landlords have bee prosecuted, entirely missing the point of my question, in that it is about the top end of the market where there are happy tenants and professional landlords.  This is a classic attempt to diver attention from the real issue of the unintended damage the HMO licensing scheme is doing to tenants in high-quality house-shares with professional landlords.   I responded,

"So does this mean that Oxford City Council is saying the vast majority of HMOs in Oxford are unfit for their tenants or does it mean that the standards are set to high and/or being applied too bluntly?"

There was no answer!

A great morning catching up with constituents and a prospective new Carfax councillor

I spent this morning knocking on doors in Carfax, the ward I represent.  I was delighted to be joined by Cllr Stephen Brown, my ward Colleague; Cllr Graham Jones, a Lib Dem Councillor for St. Clements; and Duncan Stott about which more below.  It was great to catch up with people after the Christmas break and hear about various local issues, some of which we have already dealt with.  Carfax is a fascinating ward with a massively diverse group of electors.  I was privileged to talk to The Registrar of Oxford University at his residence this morning and feel equally at home attending the users meeting of O'Hanlon House (also in Carfax Ward) which is a critical service and facility for the homeless on the pathway back into independent housing.

I am delighted to report that following  Stephen's announcement that he's not re-standing for election as a Carfax Ward City Councillor in May, Oxford Lib Dems have chosen Duncan Stott as the next Lib Dem candidate for Carfax ward in May 2012.

Stephen has been a wonderful ward colleague and a really inspirational leader of the Lib Dem group on Oxford City Council.  I'll miss him very much but entirely understand and support his decision to take some time out to spend more time with his family and his grandchildren while they are small.  I know too that Stephen will continue to work as hard as ever for the people of Oxford, particularly in Carfax Ward, until the local elections in May.

Duncan is an incredibly energetic and enthusiastic young man who has been involved in the Lib Dems for some time and has been extremely active both nationally and locally.  He grew up in Oldham and then gained his Masters Degree at the University of York.  He moved to Oxford six years ago and works just outside our City as a Senior Research and Development engineer in a hi-tech company.  He's lived in Oxford City for those six years.  I think the great thing about Duncan is that he has a really good understanding of Oxford City as a non-student resident but also entirely understands what it's like to be a student in a big City.  I am impressed at about how well he keeps both in balance.  I hope you'll agree that he'd make a fantastic LibDem Councillor for Carfax with its 35:65 non-student:student balance and I hope you'll be able to meet him in the coming months.

I'm really enjoying and excited about working with Duncan in the run up to the elections and feel confident that we'll be a great LibDem team for Carfax, being a strong voice for students and everyone else also resident in the ward.